• @gearheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    97 days ago

    Dude is saying he can’t be expected to smuggle him back into the u.s.

    He didn’t have any complaints smuggling him into El Salvador.

  • @DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -47 days ago

    Let’s start bombing shit. Or just killing folks. I fucking hate Trump but this is an American and other countries need to understand our citizens are not fair game.

      • @DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Because I’ve suggested America use it’s military to bomb the literal fuck out a country that’s not in Europe?

        Okay, Sherlock.

        • @slinkyjelly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          because an american agency sent them there in the first place so are you stating that we should be bombing or killing folks in america?

    • zqps
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Why would they see it that way if your own government clearly doesn’t?

    • @Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      He’s Salvadoran. The whole thing is fucked up and wrong, but they didn’t deport an American citizen. (Yet.)

  • Shadow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1408 days ago

    Tourism makes up 11% of El Salvador’s GDP.

    Sounds like that should change too.

  • @BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    908 days ago

    When/if the judge starts arresting people involving, the charges need to be for murder. If they can prove that he’s alive, the charges can be lowered to abduction and attempted murder, plus everything. Throw the fucking book at them, and find a way to make it not federal, pardonable charges.

  • @Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    628 days ago

    Sadly, I don’t think he’s ever going to be seen again, I hope against hope that I am wrong, but that he is no longer alive is the only reason I can think of that would make them not only refuse to allow anyone to visit, but deny him passage home.

    • oppy1984
      link
      fedilink
      English
      258 days ago

      Him being dead wouldn’t be the only reason. If he’s allowed back to the U.S. he’d be subject to our laws about treatment of prisoners and there’s a good chance he would get word out about how bad it is in that south American concentration camp. They know they can’t let that happen.

        • oppy1984
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 days ago

          I always forget about central America. Also I suck at geography, I have it stuck in my head that anything south of Mexico is south America.

          Thanks for the correction.

  • @null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    558 days ago

    Did anyone actually think they’d let him see anything? Why would they.

    I’m not naive enough to think he’s still alive but that’s beside the point.

    • @Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 days ago

      Did seriously no one bother reading the article? There are pictures of him meeting with the senator.

        • @Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 days ago

          There are several pictures. Your adblocker’s filters might be a bit too aggressive.

          • @null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 days ago

            Van Hollen went to El Salvador to visit Garcia but was initially denied access.

            Reuters published this article, the subject of this post, saying as much. There are no pictures of Garcia in this article.

            My comment, that you originally responded to, was posted with reference to this article, before anything else happened.

            A few hours later Van Hollen was allowed to interview Garcia. Various news outlets have published articles about that meeting and those articles include photos of Van Hollen meeting with Garcia.

    • @vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      198 days ago

      I think he is still alive. Bukele made agreements with the leaders of all the major gangs in El Salvador to get them to reduce violent crime. In exchange he gave some money and concessions as to how prisoners would be treated. If it comes out that prisoners are dying in CECOT, the gangs are going to treat that as Bukele breaking their agreement and violent crime will shoot up.

      Even if he’s still alive, though, there’s a 0% chance he, or anyone else Trump sends there, will ever come out of CECOT while Bukele or Trump is still in power. It would completely undermine so much about their regimes at this point. They are using CECOT as the ever present existential threat against opposition. It’s supposed to be a black hole people go into and never leave. They can’t let anyone out ever or it proves that people can get out. They don’t want anyone to believe that is possible. They can’t let anyone believe that is possible or it’ll breed massive opposition in both countries.

      • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 days ago

        Bukele made agreements with the leaders of all the major gangs in El Salvador to get them to reduce violent crime. In exchange he gave some money and concessions as to how prisoners would be treated. If it comes out that prisoners are dying in CECOT, the gangs are going to treat that as Bukele breaking their agreement and violent crime will shoot up.

        This agreement makes no sense. Nobody ever leaves CECOT alive so what are these gangs supposedly gaining by agreeing to this?

        • @vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 days ago

          I didn’t make the agreement. It’s been widely reported on.

          The US treasury said that an investigation into government officials and gang leaders revealed the secret negotiations. Luna [chief of the Salvadoran penal system and vice-minister of justice and public security] and Marroquin [chairman of the Social Fabric Reconstruction Unit] allegedly “led, facilitated and organized a number of secret meetings involving incarcerated gang leaders, in which known gang members were allowed to enter the prison facilities and meet with senior gang leadership”.

          In addition to financial benefits for the gang members, incarcerated leaders received special treatment in the prisons, including access to mobile phones and sex workers. It said Luna also negotiated support from MS-13 and Barrio 18 gangs for Bukele’s national quarantine during the Covid-19 pandemic.

          It sounds like the gang leaders who negotiated with Bukele’s regime are incarcerated themselves. And it’s not just prisoners in CECOT who are getting better conditions. It’s incarcerated gang members all over the country.

          • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            That quote is sparkly different from your summary. It states that gang leaders get special privileges like prostitutes and the ability to meet with their underlings in order to continue running the gang, along with government funding for the gang. What it doesn’t say is that conditions for rank and file prisoners have improved, nor does it state that prisoner conditions have improved nationwide. The quote actually makes sense why they would agree to this, but your assertions here don’t.

            Do you really think some MS-13 gang leader is going to give up his only access to running the gang, cash payments from the government, and a steady stream of prostitutes because some prisoner from the US is being mistreated or killed? I find that pretty far-fetched.

            This really reeks of disinformation in order to trick people into thinking things aren’t so bad in CECOT and complacency in that there’s some sort of safety valve that will automatically keep things from deteriorating into a straight up Nazi concentration camp.

            • @vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 days ago

              No, I think that proving one guy in CECOT has died brings into question the treatment of everyone else in CECOT, including gang members the leaders of the gang do care about.

              • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 days ago

                Those gang leaders have direct and unmonitored access to the outside world so why would anyone need to question their treatment when they have the ability to tell everyone exactly how they are being treated? Again, why would they give two shits about how some dudes from the US are being treated when they’re the ones enjoying all the privileges?

                • @vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 days ago

                  The leaders are only leaders because the unincarcerated members of the gangs listen to them and do what they say. They only do that because they believe the gang leaders have power and influence. Part of that, now, is protection for gang members who get locked up. How long do you think those leaders are going to remain leaders when everyone knows they made a deal with Bukele that Bukele isn’t living up to? Not long.

    • Catma
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 days ago

      Realistically? No

      Ideallistically? Yes. At the least prove he is alive and ok. They had to know this would be coming and had they done this it probably quiets down some of the criticism.

    • @Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      398 days ago

      There is no press anymore, they have capitulated. All you have are recorders and interpreters that push whatever Trump wants or they get banned/prosecuted.

      Standard behaviour in a Fascist regime which is what the USA became under trump

      Side note: We now have confirmation that a heavily armed population providers deplorable stats on violence and school shootings while doing exactly nothing to prevent the rise of tyranny… well done USA

      • @BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 days ago

        It’s just like when scientists study obvious things. We needed a rigorous and comprehensive study to show proof and the US has provided that.

      • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -158 days ago

        Side note: We now have confirmation that a heavily armed population providers deplorable stats on violence and school shootings while doing exactly nothing to prevent the rise of tyranny… well done USA

        Yeah my dude, just because I carry or have firearms doesn’t mean I’m obligated to protect you or your rights.

        YOU have an obligation to provide for your safety and to advocate for your rights.

        If there was a public shooting, I have no legal obligation to protect anyone. My goal would be to find a place of safety for me and my family and use my gun to eliminate or at least dissuade the attacker from going after me and mine. You and yours are on your own.

        We are also not nearly at the point of armed rebellion or insurrection here in the US. If you feel this strongly about it perhaps you should take responsibility for yourself and arm yourself instead of depending on others to do it for you.

        • @Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          Yeah my dude, just because I carry or have firearms doesn’t mean I’m obligated to protect you or your rights.

          Anyone with common sense would have spotted that… but the sole reason your constitution allows such carefree access to guns was supposed to be so you can defend YOUR OWN COUNTRY against fascism…

          The point being in that it is now proven there is no value in allowing people to freely carry guns; it’s a net detriment to society

          YOU have an obligation to provide for your safety and to advocate for your rights.

          As a Canadian I do, we just do it in a civic way as Fascism has not hit us yet…

          If there was a public shooting, I have no legal obligation to protect anyone. My goal would be to find a place of safety for me and my family and use my gun to eliminate or at least dissuade the attacker from going after me and mine. You and yours are on your own.

          Nobody is asking you… but you keep missing the part where a public shooting is a reality for you since so many people can have guns with almost no preparation, safety or responsibility. Feel free to keep living in your Rambo hero fantasy

          We are also not nearly at the point of armed rebellion or insurrection here in the US

          Let me guess, you think that because they have not come for you yet?.. “fuck you, got mine” is a lousy way to build a society

          • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 days ago

            That’s not the real reason for the amendment. This is one of the few things where the real reason is right there in the text itself.

            A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,

            It was so they could easily assemble a defense force without the need of a standing army just like they did at the start of the revolution. Not so the peasant masses could more easily overthrow them.

            • @Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              07 days ago

              Well yes but the current interpretation was that peasant masses could defend themselves from tyrannical governments… it has always been a pretzel of logic but that is what they pushed and why the USA is such a violent mess now

          • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Anyone with common sense would have spotted that… but the sole reason your constitution allows such carefree access to guns was supposed to be so you can defend YOUR OWN COUNTRY against fascism… The point being in that it is now proven there is no value in allowing people to freely carry guns; it’s a net detriment to society

            There are many reasons the right to gun ownership is enshrined in the constitution. Resisting or eliminating tyranny is the most extreme example. But anyone not trying to make hyperbolic anti-2A statements would know this. There is great value in carrying guns. Statistically speaking conceal and carry card holders are the most law abiding segment of society.

            As a Canadian I do, we just do it in a civic way as Fascism has not hit us yet…

            Lol, your Conservative Party candidate Pierre Poilievre was well on his way to winning handily until Trump derailed him with his 51st state and tariff antics. I also seem to remember far right truckers shutting down your highways a few years ago. As much as Canadians love to think they are different from the US, you’re not. You just might get lucky that Trump scared your moderate voters away from facism.

            Nobody is asking you… but you keep missing the part where a public shooting is a reality for you since so many people can have guns with almost no preparation, safety or responsibility. Feel free to keep living in your Rambo hero fantasy

            Your moral compass seems to lack direction. You were just advocating for armed insurrection in the US on your last post. Now you advocate for non violence? BTW Rambo fantasy? How is stating that you would finding a safe place and defending your life with your firearm instead of run and gunning it with an active shooter a Rambo fantasy? You seem to have such a rabid anti gun stance that it clouds your judgement.

            Let me guess, you think that because they have not come for you yet?.. “fuck you, got mine” is a lousy way to build a society.

            See my statement above about advocating for violence and then condemning. This is truly Olympic level mental gymnastics to justify your hypocrisy.

            • @Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 days ago

              There are many reasons the right to gun ownership is enshrined in the constitution

              There is literally only one. It has been twisted into a pretzel of ignorance and illogical fallacies but there is only one. If you think there are more than 1, I’d be happy to read the source

              Lol, your Conservative Party candidate Pierre Poilievre was well on his way to winning handily until Trump derailed him

              Correct, thanks for the live example. Unlike Americans, it seems we noticed and learned… you lived through the first tRump term and decided you wanted more punishment

              Your moral compass seems to lack direction. You were just advocating for armed insurrection in the US on your last post. Now you advocate for non violence?

              No, your reading comprehension lacks competence. The USA is under a fascist regime and as such, an armed resistance should be forming. Canada is not under the same threat (except from the USA) and more importantly, we do not have the “right to bear arms” for a well regulated militia.

              See my statement above about advocating for violence and then condemning.

              A complete non-sequitur… My comment on you having the “fuck you, got mine” mentality is based entirely on your claim you are not willing to move a finger for anyone other than yourself AND that you do not think tRump is enough of a dictator to do anything about it. I am simply pointing out that you think the tRump has not “crossed the line” is that you have not been personally affected by his fascist government. It has literally zero to do with my suggestion an armed resistance should form nor am I even condemning it at all LOL

              The only violence I am condemning in my comment is the fact that the idiots armed in the USA only brought school shootings… and yes, I condemn school shootings, don’t you? let me guess, it has not affected you directly so probably you’d say “we are not there yet”

              • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -3
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                There is literally only one. It has been twisted into a pretzel of ignorance and illogical fallacies but there is only one. If you think there are more than 1, I’d be happy to read the source

                Feel free to read it, seems like you could use an education.

                https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-2/

                Correct, thanks for the live example. Unlike Americans, it seems we noticed and learned… you lived through the first tRump term and decided you wanted more punishment

                Lol, please Canadians learned nothing until Trump started talking trash about Canada. Before then Canadians saw Trump v1 and decided they wanted their own shit tier version with French subtitles. BTW I voted for the lady with the economics degree. I didn’t vote for this shit.

                No, your reading comprehension lacks competence. The USA is under a fascist regime and as such, an armed resistance should be forming. Canada is not under the same threat (except from the USA) and more importantly, we do not have the “right to bear arms” for a well regulated militia.

                I can read just fine. Once again you seem to be advocating for armed violence. BTW YOU are the one who decided to comment about our American 2A rights and now you want to crawl away and hide behind your lack of rights. Pathetic.

                A complete non-sequitur… My comment on you having the “fuck you, got mine” mentality is based entirely on your claim you are not willing to move a finger for anyone other than yourself AND that you do not think tRump is enough of a dictator to do anything about it. I am simply pointing out that you think the tRump has not “crossed the line” is that you have not been personally affected by his fascist government. It has literally zero to do with my suggestion an armed resistance should form nor am I even condemning it at all LOL The only violence I am condemning in my comment is the fact that the idiots armed in the USA only brought school shootings… and yes, I condemn school shootings, don’t you? let me guess, it has not affected you directly so probably you’d say “we are not there yet”

                Wow that was amazing, contradicting yourself in back to back sentences. You start out by stating I’m a selfish jerk for not actively shooting people who are shooting at me. Then you advocate for me to shoot people who are not shooting at me. Then you top it off with a tangent about school shootings where you then condemn shooting people.

                Pick a lane and stay in it. You sound like a 🤡.

                To be clear, the only stance I have taken is for self defense and that I have no obligation to put myself in danger defending you. I also advocate that we are no where near the need for armed violence against others.

                • @Jhex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  37 days ago

                  Feel free to read it, seems like you could use an education.

                  https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-2/

                  This is exactly the ONE justification I kept referring to. Thanks for proving my point

                  I can read just fine. Once again you seem to be advocating for armed violence…

                  If you can’t tell the difference between school shootings and fighting Fascism, I can’t help you. You are either trolling, morally bankrupt or just dim.

              • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 days ago

                It says a lot about you when you choose to cite the weakest Indiana Jones movie.

                But hey your the one who’s plan is to wait for someone else to save you sooo… 🤷🏻

                • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  Dude, my plan is to let keyboard warriors make themselves look ridiculous between meetings and then have a couple beers after work.

                  The original post was about how the whole meal team six refrain of “the 2nd amendment will prevent tyranny” was also a lie, which you help prove with every post.

                  I’m not a huge war buff, but I think to have a successful revolution you’ll probably need to have a friend first.

                  I don’t think I’ve ever seen a revolution in which one buff guy managed to beat a military by having washboard abs and a closet full of rifles, and I doubt you’ll be the first.

    • @Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      258 days ago

      It’s just speculation, but they’re saying it because nobody has ever been released from CECOT. It’s not unlikely that they are just murdering the inmates and pocketing the money that the United States is giving them, or not sufficiently protecting inmates from violence between other inmates.

      • @vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 days ago

        It’s not unlikely that they are just murdering the inmates

        I do think that’s rather unlikely. After Bukele came into power promising a massive reduction in violent crime he met with the leaders of all the major gangs in El Salvador. He asked them tor reduce violent crime in exchange for payoffs and a promise of improved conditions for prisoners. Within 2 years of that agreement violent crime in El Salvador reached the lowest point it’s been in 30 years. If it comes out that prisoners in CECOT are dying, that agreement disappears and violent crime skyrockets. That would completely undermine Bukele’s basis of support.

        • @3laws@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          Yes, no president has ever lied to gangs/terrorists before. Certainly no other president ever.

          • @vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 days ago

            Well, we now know for a fact that Abrego Garcia is still alive.

            And it’s not about him lying. Of course a piece of shit like Bukele is more than willing to lie to anyone. The point is that he is benefitting politically from this arrangement and if he doesn’t uphold his end he can suffer political harm. It’s not just a promise, it’s a two-way deal.

  • Pyr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    428 days ago

    I don’t understand what justification El Salvador has for keeping a man imprisoned who never broke any of their laws. Can I pay them to hold my neighbour in prison? How much does it cost?

  • @Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    378 days ago

    Because he’s probably dead or at least has had something happen to him they don’t want getting out

    • @reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      There are plenty of other wrongly imprisoned people down there that the senator could be given an access to. They’re not all dead yet I’m hoping.

  • Obinice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    268 days ago

    gasp, they won’t let him visit the guy that went through the death camp?

    gasp