Is it weird? Is it rude? Should threads be archived?

  • Owl
    link
    fedilink
    2830 days ago

    I don’t understand why people would find it rude/incorrect

    • @droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      1630 days ago

      God knows there aren’t many new threads on lemmy so I’ve been searching random keywords looking for interesting old threads to read and sometimes comment on.

      • @minibyte@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        1429 days ago

        Quite a few of us sort by “New Comments”. Posting to an old thread can help breathe new life into it, especially if you have something new to add to the conversation.

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    It is a holdover from the old forum days when adding a comment would pop a thread to the top of the front page, so someone going through and commenting on multiple old posts would flood the front page with outdated discussions. Generally those people would also post worthless comments, like ‘Thanks’, that didn’t add anything.

    Now that we have more ways to sort the underlying problem is no longer relevant, but some people still hold on to that mindset. Some people who weren’t around for the older forums may have caught the disdain from others, or could even just have it in their minds that discussions always have limited time frames for whatever reason.

    I don’t care unless someone relies to my comment to continue some stupid argument they started four months ago.

    • @droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      729 days ago

      Oh I didn’t know that! I didn’t grow up on forums but I used them a few times here and there. You’re right new replies do push a thread to the top. Kind of a bad design lol.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        629 days ago

        It was a great design when the intent was to make new discussion visible. It was great for reviving threads when new and prodictive discussion was added!

        Like any design, there will be cases where it doesn’t work as intended. It is hard to design around people adding non-productive comments.

        • @droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          429 days ago

          Fair point

          There’s only one forum I visit nowadays and it gets older threads revived every now and then. Usually to say “Whatever happened to that? Is it done yet?”

  • Otter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1330 days ago

    I get comments on months old posts, I’m fine with it since it will help future users

    If the person is looking for a discussion (ex. They need help with the software I posted about), then it’s usually better they make a new post

  • @Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Depends on the type of community, forums it’s potentially disruptive since it bumps it to the top. Redsit/Lemmy style it matters less.

    I certainly would advocate against archiving Lemmy posts in a way that “locks” them, I can’t tell you how many times an old reddit post shows up in a search result and helpful newer replies with the most recent information is still getting added sporadically.

  • @hansolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    829 days ago

    If it’s relevant for future people who found the thread the same way I did, sure. It’s like of you were looking for a treasure in a network of caves, and you see writing in the wall from previous treasure seekers saying “beware of bats.” If I add “left cave has dragon” it might help someone else.

    Also, if the OP or other accounts are still active, they might get still a notification.

  • @QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    829 days ago

    If it’s a question that has no answer (or no useful answer) it’s totally fine to comment with an answer.

    I figure that someone will eventually stumble across the same thread that I did if they have a similar question. Might as well contribute and share some knowledge.

    Relevant xkcd:

    • @octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      529 days ago

      My favorite was a specific problem I had modding Morrowind on Linux years ago and posting to reddit.

      Only for years to pass and I search for the same problem, only to find my own damn post with no replies.

  • @7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    730 days ago

    If it provides me information I need… I’ll thank the poster.

    I’ve commented a thank you a literal decade after the helpful comment was made.

    When I was on reddit… If the thread was archived, I’d copy the link and send the person a message saying thanks. If it was very helpful.

    I don’t have a problem with it obviously. Back in the day being a thread necromancer was frowned upon. Now, it doesn’t bump the thread to the top of the forum, so who cares

    • @Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      229 days ago

      Back in the day being a thread necromancer was frowned upon. Now, it doesn’t bump the thread to the top of the forum, so who cares

      I never even saw the problem back then. If new info made the thread relevant again (even if it was just that someone new had something to say), it was fine with me to see a thread pop back up to the top.

  • @Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    729 days ago

    Even on reddit I’d get replies to years old comments. I remember one user watching Breaking Bad and reading the old response threads and engaging with me from there.

    I don’t mind at all, especially as I’m trying to be uplifting with my comments.

  • gon [he]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    530 days ago

    I mean… Sometimes it’s weird, but sometimes it’s not. Depends on what the thread is about and how long it’s been, I guess.

    Generally speaking, if the thread isn’t “time-sensitive,” if you want to reply, just reply. That’s my take.

      • The wording had initially confused me.

        I thought this was about posts that got no comments, not about necro’ing posts.

        Honestly, I think necro’ing posts is really only a problem when your forum software doesn’t have many options for sorting the feed. Lemmy is more advanced; if you don’t like necro’d posts, then just don’t sort by recent activity.

  • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N
    link
    fedilink
    English
    429 days ago

    If I come across a post and I have something significant enough to comment, I leave it regardless of age. But I don’t think I’m ever going to see anything more than a few days old with how I browse.

  • Perfectly fine. Bumps don’t do what they used to do in messageboard/BBS contexts, so if you have something useful/clever/funny to say in a dead thread I say go for it.

    Heck, sometimes it can prompt a follow-up when someone says “You know, I should do [x related to topic]” after some time has passed, which is fun.

  • Ricky Rigatoni
    link
    fedilink
    229 days ago

    The older the thread the funnier necroing is. If the forums I was on in middle school were still around you can bet I’d be bumping some of those threads just for teh lulz.