• @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -624 days ago

      It does seem a little odd to include the USA twice and not to include China or the USSR once. They could have even included Dutch slavers putting Africans on a boat.

    • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      -1724 days ago

      Dont love the AI

      Are the taking Lemmy as revenue away from artists? Are they selling this commercially? Should they have commissioned a perfessional artist for your free meme?

        • CarrotsHaveEars
          link
          fedilink
          124 days ago

          You know when you repost someone else’s work, you should at least say who made it, right?

          AI-generated artwork has thousands if not millions artists’ names attached to it.

          • @Tattorack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            224 days ago

            I don’t understand. I mean, you’re right, of course. But, who are you answering? What are you answering?

    • @Apepollo11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      425 days ago

      Shocking truth:

      Humans can make all art made by AI.

      Humans can make all calculations made by computers.

      People use tools to achieve their goals more efficiently. It’s the way it always has been. It doesn’t mean there’s no value attached to it.

      Incidentally, for all of the “this is AI” brigade, what are you picking up on? I’m not picking up on any of the classic tells. Aside from the closed fists in the first and last image, where I’d personally go for an open hand, I don’t see anything obviously amiss.

      • @9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        1725 days ago

        Dude pulling on native american person’s braid, mother and daughter look too similar, mom’s hand is messed up, SS logos are messed up

        There’s a wave of AI generated comics hitting lemmy right now. At first i was in the same boat as you, found it difficult to identify

        Now after seeing more and more, my brain’s detection algorithms are updating.

        I’m quite good at seeing obvious AI slop images, but comics was a totallly new thing i had to learn to detect

        • @Apepollo11@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Ah, thanks for that!

          I was genuinely interested because I used to lecture when the GANs first started appearing. Ironically enough, I used to point out to the students how you could tell photos were generated (mismatching ears shapes, asymmetrical glasses, oddly shaped jewellery etc.).

          Seems like I need more exposure to the comic art side of things!

      • Suite404
        link
        fedilink
        224 days ago

        Yea, I don’t mind AI for personal use stuff like this. But AI in commercial stuff is a big no go.

        • CarrotsHaveEars
          link
          fedilink
          124 days ago

          To me, it is not even the commercial stuff that matters. AI-generated image should never be in public domain because it is all stolen from others, piece by piece. The copyright is a big question mark.

        • @Apepollo11@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -224 days ago

          I agree with this entirely. I personally use AI to help me do things that I don’t have the time to do “the old fashioned way”.

          I can draw, paint, sing, sculpt, etc, and I enjoy doing all these things very much. But I don’t have time any more - I have a full-time job, two kids taking up most of my time, and Long COVID means I’m asleep for almost all of what would be left over.

          I’ve used AI to help me bring 2d art, music and 3d models into this world that would otherwise be trapped in my head.

  • Anas
    link
    fedilink
    3624 days ago

    Why are there way more AI comic posts than usual lately?

    • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1824 days ago

      Because sometimes people have an idea for a relevant comic, but not the artistic ability to draw it. So, they use AI tools to create the artwork.

      • @grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        1624 days ago

        Damn, you’re right, artistic talent is totally required to make webcomics.

        I apologise for my glib response. I don’t doubt your sincerity. Things may change in the future. It’s just that in this particular historical moment AI has as much to do with democratising talent as nfts did with supporting solo artists/creators.

  • rowdyrockets
    link
    fedilink
    3624 days ago

    I think this community needs to have a conversation about whether we keep allowing AI comics.

    It’s a no for me but I’m willing to vote.

      • rowdyrockets
        link
        fedilink
        1524 days ago

        Nice “gotcha”. But you know what I meant. We should discuss adding it as a sub rule - so we can report it for AI as they come.

          • rowdyrockets
            link
            fedilink
            223 days ago

            As is your right. If the community agrees to make a change, and you don’t like that change, you’re welcome to leave the community. Congrats on having free will!

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1324 days ago

        When I’ve got 10,000 AI generated candidates on my ballot and its my job to pick out the half dozen real submissions, it feels like there’s a structural problem with the election’s process.

  • Natanox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1625 days ago

    It’s an inherent problem of the human condition, for some reason our own moral compass becomes dysfunctional once the authority and therefore responsibility is with someone else. It’s the reason the Stanford Prison Experiment went so wrong once the professor took influence; we’re not inherently evil, we (as a species) are just drawn to the current ruleset as dictated by our social group or idol of choice, especially if we get convinced it’s somehow necessary.

    Obviously not trying to abolish any guilt here, people are still responsible for what they’re doing.

    In the end we need way higher quality of education globally, better social security, rethink society (don’t have children be on their own and make parents constantly burned out, god damn it) as well as political systems so they are designed to prevent any definition of an in- and out-group. Protections for who, what, where and how people are are great, and stuff like Germany’s Article 1 is a good start, but it needs to go way further.

    We need to design an environment that allows us humans to become more than we currently are if we ever want to get out of this cycle.

      • Natanox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        325 days ago

        It confirms claims Zimbardo pushed participants towards the results he wanted, something he has disputed.

        That’s actually what I referred to, although I indeed didn’t know know about the other statements by participants. Only knew about someone in Stanford digging through the files and realizing Zimbardo fucked everything up by pushing towards a certain outcome. Mmh…

        I still stand with my statements about what we should do better though.

        • shrugs
          link
          fedilink
          225 days ago

          I’m with you on that. Most people all to thankfully give up their responsibility and do what they are told. The less they see the outcome of their actions the better (drone Pilots for example).

          Anyway, i think the stanford prision experiment is a bad example for that though, because it also incorprates peer pressure and concludes that nobody will think twice doing harm to others, as long as they are told to do so by authority. Humanity isn’t that bad I hope

          • Jerkface (any/all)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            Humanity isn’t that bad I hope

            Then explain human history and literally everything else we know. It is only denial, optimistic bias, self delusion, and other mediating psychological effects that allow us to see ourselves as anything better.

            • shrugs
              link
              fedilink
              125 days ago

              Then explain human history and literally everything else we know

              For what? This would change nothing. The only thing you can change are your own actions at this very moment.

              It is only denial, optimistic bias, self delusion, and other mediating psychological effects that allow us to see ourselves as anything better

              “Everyone is an asshole, so it’s okay for me to be an asshole too”?!

              You do you! I strongly believe most people don’t enjoy seeing other people suffering. I’m no saint either but I try my best. I think that’s a way better starting point than your take.

              • Natanox
                link
                fedilink
                English
                125 days ago

                For what? This would change nothing. The only thing you can change are your own actions at this very moment.

                I thought we were talking about societal concepts? Those would literally change everything given it’s about the shape of our very environment, it’s okay if you don’t want to engage in such a discussion though.

                • shrugs
                  link
                  fedilink
                  124 days ago

                  Sorry mate, english is not my first language. I just wrote a response anyway but lemmy bugged when i tried to post it. :(

                  I think everyone can act like a monster if he thinks the other person deserves it. unfortunately all the negativity in the media and from influential people enforces this worldview.

                  I try to abstain from and to not discuss shit like that. Life is too short to be angry about things i can’t change. What i can do is act as good as i can in my personal life and that’s about it.

                  Have a nice day and don’t let the negativity get the best of you

  • @D_C@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    The good news for (most of) the pieces of shit from the 1830s and 1940s is that there wasn’t a tool for us to use to name and shame.
    However for this generation of fascist scum there is now the internet. And it should be used to track down and tackle the ICE scumbags. Fuck them.

    Edit: Reee, AI, blah blah because, yes, that’s the most horrible thing about this post. Definitely not the kidnapping and fascism. Fuck sake.

    • @Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      225 days ago

      you are on track with the right kind of thinking and the children are too busy whining about the AI. fuck the AI haters. let them say it to my face. we have bigger fish to fry. anybody that wants to get distracted like that is a liability and should be treated as such.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Fuck sake.

      Dude. Nobody got kidnapped or fascisted over this post. But the use of AI was a real thing that actually occurred. Yes, it’s perfectly appropriate for people to care about that, and some people, believe it or fucking not, can hold two things in their heart at the same time. If I can make you ignore whatever I’m actually doing just by referencing Mussolini, I have a superpower over you. And maybe people do.

      Also, fuck your low key ableism. Let “reee” die.

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        But the use of AI was a real thing that actually occurred.

        Ya, a real artist could have gotten paid for this post!

        … No? Get their cut off that sweet sweet Lemmy ad revenue?

        I’m confused, in what way was an artist harmed by this? The artist that didn’t make this is missing out on their Internet points?

  • @MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1525 days ago

    I approve the message! The images are just reinforcement so I don’t really care if it’s AI. Not everyone can draw.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      And what about the theft and abuse of creators that was required to create the AI in the first place? If we’re just going to steal shit, we don’t even need the AI, we can just steal shit from each other.

      • @RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        725 days ago

        Well, this image isn’t being used commercially so no one is making money off of it. I think that seems like a fair use of AI. Similar to how people make memes with images they stole from the Internet

      • @Apepollo11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Human artists train using other artists work. Every avenue of human endeavour is based on what came before.

        My own default style shares similarities with Barbara Canepa and Rumiko Takahashi. Why? Because, as a teen, I used to copy their stuff, trying to “unlock” the parts of it that I like.

        If I was to directly copy an image, and say it was my own, then that crosses over into stealing. But that’s not what has happened here. And unless you get very specific with the prompts, it’s not likely to happen.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          Okay, but did you literally illegally download the material in the first place? Did you violate licenses that you obtained the material under? Do you intentionally imitate specific artists so that casual observers can’t tell the difference and then fill the entire space with more shitty art using that style than any human artist could ever product, such that the original artist who developed it no longer has control over that style and has their future income devastated?

          It’s not the same thing and you’d have to be willfully ignorant by this point to think that it is. All the major LLMs are “fruit of the poisonous tree.” They were trained using stolen data that they were not entitled to use for those purposes. The artists SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID for their work training the AI.

          • @RagingRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            625 days ago

            What if I told you that I trained my brain on copyrighted materials that I pirated from the Internet? I make games and I have for sure downloaded games I didn’t pay for and played them. I know I have used some of the mechanics from those games on my own. Am I a bad person?

          • @Apepollo11@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            325 days ago

            I don’t agree with your take, sorry.

            To say that an artist should have exclusive control over a style is dangerous.

            Every time there is a big upheaval in an industry, it affects people’s jobs in that sector. Henry Ford’s investments in automation, put a lot of small car manufacturers in a tricky position. It also led to cars being affordable for most American households.

            I’m not unsympathetic, in fact I’m more than a little aware that AI will be taking over my sector, the software development jobs, within a couple of years (and unlike art, I can’t see any market for “hand-crafted” code!).

            But, the genie can’t be put back in the bottle. There’s no possible positive that comes from “calling out” AI art whenever you see it. It doesn’t help artists - if anything we’ve seen artists having to go out of their way proving their work isn’t AI.

  • @mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1324 days ago

    Saw this on a thread a while back:

    The funny and sad thing is I think the original panel was showing American imperialism against historical Nazi facism (soldier attire), so it was very easily repurposed for the next ethnostate of Israel with the Nazi flag being redundant against the very obvious German soldier.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1124 days ago

    Fascist: “We’re just following orders.”

    Liberal: “Court orders?”

    Fascist: “Shut up and get in the van.”

    Liberal: “Okay, but I’m going to post a frowny face about it on Twitter.”

  • @Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    What’s more annoying? That people have the ability to generate content with AI, or that everyone on lemmy constantly complains about it?

    You’re banging your heads against walls over and over. Stop. Shut up.