• Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    In normal times, Pete would have resigned for a mistake like this. Today? MAGA cracks a beer for him.

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Would this be good publicity or bad publicity for signal?

        “Even government officials think we’re secure!”

        Or

        “Idiots actually think signal is secure for classified information”

        • ChumbleyBumbley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Signal is very secure, but your encryption doesn’t matter when you add unknown people to your encrypted chats.

          It’s like buying the most secure, unpickable door lock and giving the key with the address on it to a complete stranger

          • Abnorc@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t doubt Signal per se, but I am surprised that government officials would use it to discuss military plans. I would have thought the government would use something developed by the military just to be sure that it’s safe.

            Sure, they can vet the source code, but it seems more straightforward for the government to develop their own solution than create a team to vet the security of something that they didn’t write. Maybe it’s overkill, but I’d almost think they should be doing this on vetted hardware as well. Signal is also relatively new, and they had to have a way to discuss these things beforehand.

            • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s what Buttigieg indicated. There are secure means of communicating classified information, with a process for ensuring people with clearance are the only ones allowed to view this information. I imagine those rules are in place exactly for this reason, to prevent accidental leaks.

              The rookies that Trump hired probably didn’t see the harm in doing it in this way, I mean come on, Signal is secure so what is there to worry about?

              Who knows what else has been leaked to the wrong people accidentally.

          • Siegfried@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would have expected the USA to have their own private network for this shit… such a meh nation nowadays

            • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They do have ways of talking of classified information. Coincidentally, it is more tedious than using Signal and you are forced to keep records of those conversations, things that these people didn’t want.