• @boke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2122 months ago

    This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

      • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Article is about selling nuclear powered subs. Canada doesn’t need these boondoggles for defense against US, because the mission capability is being months at sea.

    • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      452 months ago

      Regardless, it’s presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

      Though I’d be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

    • @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 months ago

      They don’t need attack subs. They need boomer subs. At this point, Canada needs a nuclear deterrent. And I say that as an American who would be in the cross hairs of said nuclear deterrent. Canada should contract with the French for protection under their umbrella until they can build some of their own. The lesson of Ukraine should be that nukes protect small nations from fascist larger ones. Canada could easily end up like Ukraine. It’s not like fascists can’t find a casus belli. Putin was “restoring Russian glory” or some such. Trump would be “finishing the American Revolution” or some other bullshit.

      Please, Canada, from a friend of yours to the south, do not take this threat lightly. No one is going to be able to save you if the US decides to invade. The same oceans that protect you will prevent your rescue. The only hope Canada will ever have of being able to militarily protect its borders from the US is a credible nuclear deterrent.

      Just please, don’t harden your hearts while you build these weapons of destruction. Don’t close your doors to refugees from the US. As someone who is on the regime’s enemies list, hopping across the Canadian border and begging for asylum is the last chance I might have if things really go bad.

      • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        -42 months ago

        Instead of putting all eggs in France basket, Canada should also approach North Korea, China, and Russia for detente and nuclear deterrence. Flirting with North Korea is best path to get SK and Japan to commit to our auto industry, and decouple from their own US extortion. Taking bids for Russia to take over NORAD sites is more constructive than continuing military cooperation, and shamefully subservient to US defense pacts with Philippines. If Russia is no longer the enemy the US forces us to make, then we are protecting the US from Russia, and they need to pay for that privilege.

        US and foreign auto industry must be forced to choose Canada over US. US manufacturing destroyed through export tariffs on materials and energy, and proceeds used to subsidize Canadian manufacturing. Manufacturing/MSFT in Washington and Michigan states must recommend secession and joining Canada, and be covered by our nuclear shields.

    • @yannic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

      • @Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        IIRC only 2 out of the 9 french subs in service exclusively carry torpedoes and anti-ship missiles (Rubis class). I’m sure the 3 Suffren class with no second strike capabilities could still deliver some sort of short ranged tac nuke. So there are high chances that this is a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      Lamp Oil, Rope, Nuclear Subs? You want it? It’s yours, my friend. As looong as you have enough Euros.

    • @jimd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      What’s the point of these submarines if there aren’t nukes on them?

  • @ShakingMyCane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1332 months ago

    France manages to get a sub to us before the UK even deigns to comment. That says it all. Merci beacoup!

    • JM⭐
      link
      fedilink
      -522 months ago

      Well done on falling for the propaganda

  • @CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    852 months ago

    JT was just in France as one of his last acts as PM. Mere days later this bad boy shows up in a Halifax harbour. 🤔🤔🤔 Merci a la belle France 🇫🇷🤝🇨🇦

  • @Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    652 months ago

    Could have imagined this happening as little as 3 years ago.

    An ally sending a nuclear deterrent into our waters as a message/warning to the US. This normally happens to countries like Iran or North Korea

    • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      To be accurate, this is a nuclear propelled attack submarine. It does not carry nuclear warheads and is not what we normally call a “nuclear deterrent”.

      • @FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        It does not but can carry nuke tipped missiles and even though we have the screw signatures of our allies…this is still a message that the rest of the world except Moscow is looking down on us in disappointment

  • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    552 months ago

    Never have I been more pleased to see a foreign navies nuclear attack sub in my nations waters.

    (odd times)

  • @ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    212 months ago

    Current timeline feels like one alternative Red Alert timeline, where alongside of Hitler, Stalin also got erased from history, and now Russia and the US have turned fascistic.

  • @DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Important note: The “Nuclear” in “Nuclear attack submarine” means that it is powered by a nuclear reactor. It does not refer to its armament. An “attack” submarine means it is designed to attack ships and other submarines and these are typically not capable of carrying and launching ICBMs. Nuclear-armed deterrent submarines are called Ballistic Missile Submarines.

  • @Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    132 months ago

    Don’t tease me!

    NOBODY backs an American Revolution like the French!

    🇫🇷🦅🎆

  • @Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well this year is going just smoothly.

    Better get that bug-out bag ready. Remember iodine tablets.