• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    1 year ago

    funny but make no mistake, the entire purpose of doge is to find funds to divert to rich people

    • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The money is already diverted. That’s what the tax cuts were in 2017.

      This is just a way to upset various government agencies that might otherwise not be ok with law being upended to accomplish the goal of eliminating services our elected government has mandated.

      The entire legislative branch is broken now.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not American, but it seems to me, that to get to where you currently are, the legislative branch probably needed to be already busted.

        This just shines a spotlight on how busted.

        • jecxjo@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          it’s a demonstration of how democracy is broken. It all depends on everyone to play nicely. You can cheat but if you’re caught you bow out gracefully. The checks and balances are all based on one part of the government pointing saying “we see what you did, you’re out.” But what happens when one side has no shame. What happens when they have no empathy for others?

          Congress controls funding and it is explicitly not the President’s role. He is now circumventing the laws to get his agenda done without the support of Congress which should trigger an impeachment. Of course Congress is either already in his pocket or is too impotent to do anything so here we are.

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            At it’s core, yes, absolutely.

            It should have checks and balances. The problem is that those checks and balances rely on people to take action. As you’ve stated, in this case, Congress should be the ones to stop unlawful power grabs by the President and start the impeachment process.

            This shows very clearly that the people who are tasked with the duty of keeping those checks and balances in place are either unable to act (Democrats), or unwilling to act (Republicans). This sad reality means that the system is fundamentally broken to the point that it is liable to collapse. Trump/Musk/Vance are already making large swaths of the American population very unhappy with what they’ve been doing in the first 100 days. The only alternative to four+ years of this is basically a revolution at this point. Given how many “fans” they’re making in the Whitehouse, that possibility doesn’t seem impossible.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guarantee that’s not going to happen. In fact with all the savings from the other more critical services being defunded, Elon will have more money for his own projects.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      GIMME ALL YOUR LUNCH MONEY, PUNK! DON’T YOU KNOW THERE ARE PEOPLE STARVING WHO CAN’T BUY GROCERIES???

      … Now to buy second dessert with this sudden windfall!

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      well, the one that hit the news recently is that bullshit $400m ‘armored tesla’ contract for state department. the one they ‘oopsed’ and went back to remove tesla by name from.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        That whole thing sounds rather counterintuitive. Armor is supposed to protect the occupants of the vehicle, but Tesla’s crown jewel of armored* trucks has a track record of spontaneous system failures that put its occupants in direct harm.

        *with glass windows and steel sheet metal that can’t stop a bullet.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Looks like that was initiated under the Biden administration?

        The Tesla contract started in the Biden administration “to explore interest from private companies to produce armored electric vehicles,” a State Department spokesperson said on Thursday.

        Tesla was the only company to express interest in the department’s request at the time.

        https://www.npr.org/2025/02/13/g-s1-48571/trump-administration-order-400-million-worth-of-armored-teslas

        • nexguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Doesn’t matter. Musk must withdrawal his company from consideration due to conflict of interest.

  • icdmize@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Donald Trump’s dad made a lot of his money off of overcharging for FHA housing. Does that count?

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Which SpaceX subsidies are you referring to? Just the contracts they’re fulfilling for NASA and the DOD?

    • IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that’s the case, which I suspect it is, we look really fucking dumb being so hyperbolic(or what would the word be here? I just woke up). Let’s not stoop to their level with nonsense like this, there are plenty of legitimate criticisms to be made.

    • Darth_Mew@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      you don’t. there is no escape and no one is coming to save you just be a better person while ur alive

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cutting EV subsidies would lead to more gas cars, which isn’t good. Investing in public transit would be better, but encouraging EVs is also good.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think everyone is good with EV subsidies, just not those for companies whose executives have conflicts of interests as they act as government officials overseeing the spending.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        the subsidy thing is backwards.

        most ev shouldn’t get subsidies. especially not the heavy tanks that do more damage to the infrastructure.

        petrol-powered vehicles should be taxed more instead–a lot more. at purchase (or resale), at registration, every year at tag renewal, and at the pump. and be subject to lifetime emissions and safety inspections.

        charge double or triple in fees for ownership and push gas prices to ~ $2 per litre like it is in parts of europe, then most everybody but the least-endowed will be buying battery electric vehicles. small, efficient ones.

        • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is that unlike Europe we don’t have a walkable country. You guys have cities that are less spread apart. I wish our cities were more community friendly infrastructure. My city is starting to put bike trails that are desperately needed since we are being run over while biking. There’s always a story with someone being hit.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I really wish I could get this across to the FuckCars people in countries other than the U.S.

            I just moved from Terre Haute, Indiana in the U.S. to Blackburn in England. The fact that virtually everything you need is within a half-hour walk, most of it much less, cannot be overstated. It’s just not like that in the U.S. Terre Haute has something like 40% the population of Blackburn and driving from one end of town to another, and the shops are spread out all over town, takes 45 minutes.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So would only Tesla not be able to get ev tax credits? The other big manufacturers also have huge pull in government. Though I agree having Elon making decisions is a disaster and extremely prone to abuse.