• @pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    503 months ago

    This is pretty awesome. I do see the need to be able to add categories of interest. Like follow history, the arts, etc. Cool regardless.

    • misterdoctor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      233 months ago

      “I have had plenty of people message me and even make issues on my GitHub asking for some insane crazy WikiTok algorithm,” Gemal told Ars. “And I had to put my foot down and say something along the lines that we’re already ruled by ruthless, opaque algorithms in our everyday life; why can’t we just have one little corner in the world without them?”

      The developer seems staunchly anti-algorithm but I feel like some sort of filter system would work well. I know nothing about development but the same level of randomosity (it’s a word don’t look it up) but for specific topics would be amazing.

      • @auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        153 months ago

        ;/

        Algorithms themselves are fine. It’s wikipedia. I’d actually use it if it brought me to interesting pages based on a recommender algorithm.

  • @GluWu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    343 months ago

    Saw this posted in a ADHD com a few days back. Every comment was just like “oh no…”. I opened it and like 20 minutes later realized, oh no. I can and have spent many entire days just reading Wikipedia and following linked subjects. So much so I run out in areas. I can’t handle a lot of visual and audio stimulation, short form content is such a nightmare for me, can’t watch it. But give me pages of the most dense info and I’m hooked. I just need the option to download every paper referenced from every Wikipedia page I visit.

  • @58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    303 months ago

    Would be cool if the official Wikipedia mobile app integrated this functionality! It does have a ‘random articles’ card, but it’s nothing like this.

    Not sure ‘addiction’ is being defeated here, though 😆 Like if I’m addicted to sausages, giving me bacon instead isn’t really solving the root of the issue. The issue being those sexy, sexy pigs.

  • @RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    283 months ago

    Does it fight algorithm addiction or does it just utilise existing algorithm addiction to give you something slightly more informative?

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 months ago

    Everyday I read wikipedia and everyday, I learn something new. Fucking love this free resource

  • @HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    183 months ago

    As someone who loved the random article feature and will sometimes peruse Wikipedia at random, this is extremely fascinating to me.

  • @thevoidzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    173 months ago

    I see the dev don’t want recommendation algorithm. All good to avoid the recommendation bubble, but a category/tags might be nice instead of random everything.

  • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    153 months ago

    My God my general but shallow knowledge of many things will grow more powerful

  • @dylanjustice@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123 months ago

    This should be gamified. Use an LLM to generate a mini-quiz on the topic to make sure I read it. Give me points for acquiring new useless knowledge, and let me compete with my friends and family.

  • @portuga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 months ago

    I too find this such a nice refreshing take on wikipedia. It’s only been a few days, hope the developer improves it further. I realize some kind of recommendation algorithm opens a pandora’s box, but one can dream

    • Comalnik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      One big thing i hope they add is sorting by topic, so i can have a biology feed, a physics feed…