• @bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    364 months ago

    I believe this should work. At least some German emergency vehicles now come with filming protection.

    The linked web page reads, “Attention! Rubbernecking kills!”

    • @naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      104 months ago

      I’m not sure a pseudo QR code on the truck gives off the right message

      I actually would really like to know, what it says and would make myself punishable by that
      But I think, it looks so inviting to scan it…

      • @bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        The way I see it there are two options:

        1. You’re in a car and driving past that vehicle. If you don’t have your phone ready already, you won’t get it out in time and won’t be able to scan the code. You didn’t read the code and didn’t need to (because you weren’t rubbernecking).

        2. You’re in a car with your phone already out (because you’re expecting a crash) or you’re a pedestrian who takes out their phone to film the crash site. You do read the code and you should see it, because you’re rubbernecking.

        • @naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I was more thinking about not driving the car myself, but being driven as a passenger

          Although it’s obviously a safety issue, when people turn away their focus to checkout a crash - no discussion about that - I was more thinking about the ethical issue of gaffing at injured people

    • @marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      Wait until somebody actually makes brain implants!

      But on the other hand, people have actively used memetic hazards for millennia. Want to star a nice, cozy witch hunt?

      • Amputret
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Ah, the Basilisk Hack.

        (Nothing to do with Roko, btw.)

    • BugKilla
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      Well, yes. You could bury code or malicious data in an image, QR or otherwise, and leverage an exploit that during processing of the visual data within the camera subsystem or inter subsystem calls could hypothetically trigger an execution path that results in a different outcome than expected, all without user permission. There is a lot of sw and hw sec controls in play at internal system boundaries and it would be very very difficult to gain privilege enough to fist fuck a phone but not impossible.

      With the outstanding level of FR, NFR and Sec testing that companies perform these days it is not likely to happen. It’s not like they push out minimal viable products or something, right? /S

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’d be flattered if someone actually wanted to film me with their phone. :(