Then the assumption should be the most damning scenario for open AI that this evidence could provide.
AFAIK that is, in fact, how juries are generally instructed to regard destruction of evidence.
“Accidentally”
accidentally
Let a judge be the judge of that…
Perhaps obstructing justice isn’t as bad as copyright infringement?
I mean, even the plaintiff thinks it was an accident.
“Oopsie woopsie 🤭” - OpenAI
it is the 2024 version of the dog ate my homework
Journalistic malpractice to repeat their “accidentally” claim without attribution or quotes
average tech journalist
Barely an inconvenience
I’m gonna need you to get all the way off my back about that missing evidence
“Accidentally”
In Spain, in a major political corruption trial, a party turned in as evidence some drives that had been erased by Dban 7 times. They argued that it was routine to do seven passes.
Were they erased when the investigation started or was it done time before?
“Upise ahah my bad”
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature!
A megafuckhuge IT corp who deals in data doesn’t have backups, right, RIGHT???
OopsDidntMeanTo
“My ai ate my homework”
