Number three seems like the equivalent of assless chaps. I vote two
All chaps are assless. That’s why they’re chaps and not pants
I think of the assless part as depending on whether the individual has chosen to wear a layer underneath the chaps.
Part of the problem here is that’s a lore inaccurate spider. It shows most of the legs attached to the abdomen, when all eight legs and the pedipalps are all attached to the cephalothorax.
This guy spiders
I very don’t. I’m a pretty serious arachnophobe. But you know what they say, know thy enemy. Their chest is also their head.
Relatable
So I think a spider would Donald Duck it and wear a shirt but no pants.
2
Something between 1 and 2. I tend to see four legs as true legs, the other four as arms. Like this:
Legs on the ground, arms up.
Would
A week or two ago, I posted about a classic spider blowjob gif.
Perhaps you should scroll through my comment history.
Would
Fight it? Bad idea. That’s the wandering spider’s way to say “back off! I’m going to jump on your face, bite you, and you’ll die an agonising death! I’m serious!!”
[Still cute though. At least from a distance.]
I assume pants are supposed to cover reproductive organs as well as legs, so 2.
2 looks like a Tachikoma
The question is not “how”. The question is “why”.
Jair?
Indeed
Honestly, I’m just occasionally concerned with normal spiders “wearing” my pants right before I try to put them on.
To all the arachnophobes that read this: I’m very sorry.
avarege aussie
- Short shorts
- Pants
- Assless chaps
2
Answer, they wouldn’t
Agreed, spiders are notoriously free spirited
That’s why I hang out with spiders instead of people
Aka, Harlots!
Since its main purpose is to cover your genitals, none of the above.
If it is just to protect the legs then 2 or 3 does the job, but 2 looks impossible to create in reality unless you sew it around the spider. Maybe we are assuming the spider spins this around itself with its webs so maybe that will work.
Number two, unless it’s a slutty spider. Then number one.
Ever seen a spider molting? It’s practically 2.
