$700, and the side by sides look barely different, from my perspective. The chat seemed to have the same opinion.

      • @ViscloReader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        Things like this actually makes me sad because you know who to blame for the games failure yet you also know who will take the blame and who will leave with a golden parachute.

        • @ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          I try to focus on the part where the thing they were building was inherently bad for video games, so this makes it less likely for it to happen again.

    • @RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      278 months ago

      $200 extra for reflections between cars in GT7 or slightly better shadow resolution is not worth it IMO.

      My PS5 already collects dust as it is, since there are next to no games that actually make use of its hardware that I cannot already buy on PC to run at higher settings.

    • @Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I agree! I wanted one for another room in my house but at this price point no way I am doing that!!!

      With the last gen and the current gen being basically PC’s why not just go the PC route at this point? I am kind of at that point right now

        • @TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          I have a few of these running HoloISO running around the house to stream graphic intense games from my main rig and to run smaller games locally. Runs fine with a 680m iGPU and I never have to leave the room I’m in (garage included) to play games if I want.

          It cost more than a console, but far less than the 5 consoles I’d have to put out for that kind of convenience.

      • @flames5123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        If you are the only one playing the PlayStation, you can do remote play via the computer, phone ,or even from a PS4.

      • @jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        That’s actually why I went with the Xbox this cycle. I got a series x for the large TV and a $200 (on sale) series S for the smaller one (although we usually just use a computer monitor and play side by side on the couch).

      • burgersc12
        link
        fedilink
        English
        138 months ago

        And the best part is you don’t have to pay for online and you won’t need to rebuy your games each new console generation.

        • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          88 months ago

          First one I’ll grant you, but there was no rebuying from last gen to current gen for anything non-Nintendo.

          • burgersc12
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            If you pay for the discs, you can’t use the discs on future generations. Right? Ps4 can’t read ps3 or ps2 discs. Xbox one can read xbox and 360 discs, but they limit it to only specific games. So in general, you have to buy it once again on their online store, if its available at all.

            • @sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              Yeah, idk why Ps4 has no backwards compatibility. PS3 (fat) was backwards compatible with PS 1+2, and PS5 is backwards compatible for PS4. I didn’t buy a PS4 for that exact reason, and was lucky enough to get my hands on a PS5 during launch to play all the PS4 games I missed.

              With all the niche Japanese games I like slowly coming to PC, I probably won’t buy a new console ever again. (As an aside, if anyone has a spare fat PS3 they’re willing to sell for parts…)

              • @wiccan2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                88 months ago

                The lack of backwards comparability is because of the large difference in architecture.

                The PS2 was a128 bit custom processor, the PS3 had PS2 hardware in the original fat versions to achieve backwards compatibility, it was dropped to reduce the price.

                The PS3 was a 64 bit (I think) custom PowerPC processor.

                With the PS4 Sony switched to x86_64 processors making the console essentially a PC with bespoke custom hardware. The PS5 is the same but better speced components as the tech moved on. That’s why the PS4 & 5 are compatible, they are essentially using the same architecture.

                Microsoft is a similar story but they went all in on emulation of their old consoles which is why only certain games are allowed, they only allow the ones tested to work with the emulator.

                • @sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  38 months ago

                  The PS3 was a 64 bit (I think) custom PowerPC processor.

                  Thanks for jogging my memory, I completely forgot how different the PS3 architecture is compared to the other PlayStations and also the 360. Same reason why emulation for it is so hard (and why MGS4 has no modern ports 🥲)

              • burgersc12
                link
                fedilink
                English
                38 months ago

                It just feels so anti-consumer and everyones forgets about it and they just happily pay for content which can no longer be owned only rented.

                • @sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I agree. One of the few reasons I still stuck to consoles is because I could buy the physical games and have it on my shelf forever. That’s going the way of the dinosaurs, and while I love that things are more accessible via Steam or whatever, I can’t let my friends borrow my games, or pass it along to someone else to enjoy if I didn’t like a game as much.

                  I also just love collecting and displaying game cases and steelbooks and stuff. That’s rarely a thing anymore, either.

              • @bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                28 months ago

                The PS3 fat could only read PS2 disks because it had stripped down PS2 hardware included. It was effectively a PS2/3 combined. This was part of what drove the cost up, so they gutted that hardware from the slim.

                PS4s can’t read PS3 disks because the PS3 used a bespoke PowerPC based chipset that was a colossal pain in the ass to develop for. So for the PS4 to have backwards compatibility, they would have had to either A, include PS3 hardware in the PS4 (expensive) or B, create an efficient software translation layer/built in emulator (see “pain in the ass”).

                From what I have heard, they smartened up with the PS5. It’s basically just a faster PS4. At it’s core, it’s based on very similar hardware, so it’s easy to make PS4 games run without issue, but the boost in performance allows games designed specifically to take advantage of it.

            • @60fpsrefugee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              While pc can play old games, you can sometimes run into compatibility issues. Especially games in the ps1/2/3 era.

              Og Xbox and xbox 360 games work without much issues on Xbox one and series XS. Ps4 and Xbox one games are 99% playable on Series XS and Ps5.

      • @HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 months ago

        It did when the ps5 first came out. $500 for it was a steal back then. I wanted to build a PC at the time but due to the crazy GPU prices and low stock for other parts I decided it was best to wait. Got a ps5 instead (was also hard to get as well) and thought it was absolutely worth the price for the experience it offered. Just built the pc I wanted last fall shortly after prices started dropping. First time ever I made a good choice.

        • @Ashtear@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          Yeah, after that time I really didn’t think consoles would be as much as a midrange PC. And yet, here we are. Feels like Sony’s back to late PS2 era levels of hubris now.

        • @anivia@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Even at the time it came out you could have built a pc with an RTX 3060 for that price, which would outperform the PS5 by a big margin and have a way bigger game library

    • @PunchingWood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      Depending on how much you care about visuals, yeah.

      A decent GPU will often be the price of an entire console. That said, even if you go with high-end hardware I found that eventually the cost will make up for itself for not having to pay for PSN to make use of and play on the internet. Or the fact that games are very often priced up to 50% more on the PS store than those on PC because there are no competing stores.

    • @where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -38 months ago

      You absolutely will not get anything that runs even remotely decently with ray tracing on in any recent title.

      For the fair comparison you’re only allowed to buy new, not used parts. So, for 700$ you won’t even be able to put together a decent system with a 3070 in it.

      “Oh but i don’t care about ray tracing” – nice copium.

      • burgersc12
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I got a cheaper AMD GPU specifically because I do not give a fuck about ray tracing. Also just look at the steamdeck, you can get great performance for very cheap nowadays. It might not be as powerful or nice as a PS5 Pro, but the $700 computer has many advantages in its favor

  • @merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    288 months ago

    If consoles want to remain relevant in the age of the gaming PC, they have to try harder than being locked-down gaming PCs.

    Free and simple multiplayer, subsidised hardware, and physical game ownership were staples of most consoles for years but now the urge to turn every device into an “everything machine” has kneecapped the very purpose of these devices.

    At best, these are slightly less hassle and slightly more social than a gaming PC. At worst, they’re as anti-social and user-hostile without the cost benefit that once made them genuinely preferable.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      Sony will try to drag this thing out at least one more generation. If that goes like this one–and it has room to actually go worse–then Sony will have to make some hard decisions.

  • @simple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    278 months ago

    Darn, I posted this earlier but sadly lemm.ee is having server issues. This’ll be the main thread, then.

    Official Blog Post | PS5 Pro Reveal Trailer

    The PS5 Pro console will be available this holiday at a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of $699.99 USD, £699.99 GBP, €799.99 EUR, and ¥119,980 JPY (includes tax). It will include a 2TB SSD, a DualSense wireless controller and a copy of Astro’s Playroom pre-installed in every PS5 Pro purchase. PS5 Pro is available as a disc-less console, with the option to purchase the currently available Disc Drive for PS5 separately.

    The big question mark for me is that not only does it cost 800 euros, it does NOT come with a disc drive. There is no version of it with a disc drive like the PS5, you have to buy it as an accessory. I guess physical games really are going away.

    • @aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      168 months ago

      Yeah. Almost no one I know buys physical anything anymore. Kinda sad to see it go. We really need to instill some better laws around ownership of digital goods.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I occasionally still buy physical on the few day one releases I get because somehow getting that delivered to my house can be £5 cheaper or more

      • @IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Laws aren’t going to help keep the price down which is also an issue apart from the digital ownership. It’s always cheaper to buy physical games as they go on sale. What’s stopping Sony from selling PS Exclusive for $100 only in their store?

        Are we going to get restricted to only buying from Sony store or is Best Buy going to sell me a box with a digital code?

      • @SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think this shift will be the end of me buying newer games, period.

        I am that person who doesn’t ever buy digital. I have not bought a single digital game thus far (I haven’t pirated a game since like 2006, either). I have certainly played some, like with the PS+ subscription I got for a year when it was pretty cheap, but I wouldn’t buy them because I can’t be sure I own them, and there’s really no way to transfer the license to resell them.

        If I can’t buy physical media, I simply won’t buy the games. Maybe I’ll use subscription services now and then, but more likely I’ll either find a way to play free or won’t play them at all and find other stuff. I want the physical media because I’m poor, and having the option to sell them in a pinch is important to me if I’m going to shell out a significant amount for something I’ll probably only play once, particularly since there won’t be a used game market to reduce my spend. I haven’t had to sell my games in a very long time, so I have some 400 discs, but it’s something of a savings option that inflates alongside currency, and sometimes much more.

      • @Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        I was very close to getting a digital PS5, but I still need the drive for my old PS4 games and movies. If I were just getting into Sony now though, I imagine the story would be different.

    • @ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      The writing has been on the wall for physical games for some time. If you want to hold on to your games, DRM-free is better than physical.

      • @simple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        Sadly not an option for console. I don’t own a PS5 currently but when I did own consoles I would trade games and buy used all the time, it’s a shame this might not be possible next generation.

        • @ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          I know it’s not an option for consoles. Since the 7th gen, it was always moving in this direction. It’s probably one of dozens of reasons that PC overtook consoles in market share.

    • Omega
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      As someone who buys expensive games, games I’m excited for, or just franchises I’m invested in, the death of discs is going to really make me reevaluate my gaming. I’ll probably at least wait for a sale for every single game if I can’t have a physical copy.

      Almost all of my digital purchases are cheap games.

  • @Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The side-by-sides are definitely diminished returns compared to earlier gens where hardware bumps had very noticeable gains.

    I am sure the performance is measurably better than the base PS5, but I don’t think it’s $200-plus-separate-disc-drive better.

    I also found the game choices they used for some of these comparisons to be odd picks. Sure you have “Made for PS5” exclusives like the new Ratchet and Clank, Returnal, and Spider-Man 2, but they also heavily showcased:

    • The Last of Us Part 2

    • God of War: Ragnarok

    • Ghost of Tsushima

    • Horizon: Forbidden West

    • Control

    All of those are last-gen games that received PS5 enhancements. Being on a base PS5, I already feel like I am getting the “better” experience compared to the default for those games, so why upgrade?

  • 2ugly2live
    link
    fedilink
    English
    168 months ago

    I already feel like a chump for getting the PS5. There’s hardly any games for it. Hell, there are some games I can’t play on it. I can’t imagine what’s changed so drastically in the last couple years to even be worth an upgrade.

      • 2ugly2live
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Some of the transfered PS3 games (Katamari was one I remember). The Tomb Raider Puzzle game glitches (doesn’t on the PS4), and it seems any game that uses an app (tried to play a trivia game with the family and it didn’t work until we went to the PS4).

        Not anything life or death, big named stuff works fine, but it’s just annoying to have to go back to the PS4 to have things play right.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    158 months ago

    Why not go PC at this point. Modern consoles are locked pre-built PCs and paying $700 for a locked system is crazy.

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    138 months ago

    Sony’s problems are twofold:

    • They are charging an absurd amount of money for a game console
    • They are selling a game console that has practically no first party games for it.

    If they had plenty of the latter, they could weather this. But there are still games releasing for the PS4, and they have had 1, maybe 2 PS5 releases that would qualify as first party this year (that don’t bubble down to PC).

  • Aielman15
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This generation is already pretty weak, and it was hard to justify the original PS5 which, after a whopping four years, still has too few exclusive titles to justify the increased price point. Now they are asking for $700 (and they increased the controller’s price, too), but there’s still too few next gen titles, and it doesn’t even come with basic features like a disc tray and a vertical mount. Not even a better form factor, it’s the same old ugly case, but somehow bigger.

    The only premium thing about this thing is the price tag. $700 dollars but €800, because apparently they are dominating the European market so much that they don’t even have to try to sell it at an honest price point. With all those money you can just buy a PC. I honestly don’t think that many people who are interested in the console market (which, historically, has always been a “low budget” entry into modern gaming) would be willing to spend so much money on one.

    I guess we circled back to the PS3 era, when Sony got drunk with overconfidence. Only, this time they’ll get away with it because their main competitor is somehow even more incompetent than them. I wonder if the handheld PC market will pose a threat to their dominance in the future - at the moment, it’s a very small niche.

  • @De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    128 months ago

    I’m still waiting for a reason to get a PS5 at all, everything I’ve been interested still got released on PS4 too - except for one single game.

    I really don’t care for better specs anymore, I probably couldn’t even tell PS4 and PS5 games apart without a side-by-side comparison. Not to mention, to see a difference at all I’d need a new TV on top of the console. Not gonna happen anytime soon.

  • @MeatStiq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    I love the price. At $700 it’s just what I needed to convince my friend who was holding out for the pro to move on to PC. $700 buys a pretty decent AMD card nowadays. Shit for $800 we’re talking decent refurbished gaming PCs.

  • @zib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    The PS5 is already a very powerful piece of hardware that most devs aren’t making full use of. I honestly can’t see any justification in a hardware upgrade other than some Sony execs thinking it’ll be the end of the world if they don’t put out something new to make some profit line continue to go up.