• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    That’s actually a very low price for an anti-air missile. For comparison, the Stinger shoulder-fired missile costs more than twice as much. A Patriot missile costs four million dollars (but is much more capable). Presumably minimizing cost was a high priority when this missile was designed. Nonetheless, the cost asymmetry is one reason why degrading the ability of Hamas and Hezbollah to fire missiles at Israel is important.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hamas and Hezbollah are firing any tubes filled with any propellant they can find. you want to reduce the capabilities of groups like Hamas and Hezbollah? don’t fucking go around running an apartheid ethnostate and annexing land on the basis of blood and soil.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Cheap for a missile, but using soft power tends to be more effective, both economically and less destructive. You know, like not pissing off all your neighbors and taking folk’s land.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The system can be overwhelmed by having too many incoming rockets, so it does have its limits.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    It essentially prevented a full scale armed conflict like this past year from 2011-2023. How many lives has it saved over that 12 years?

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The lives they kill are worth so much more so its worth it to them?

    How do they justify stuff like this.

    “We think these people are worthless and we want their land. So now we spend big capital destroying that land”

    Not a single rhetoric i can make up with makes even evil sense.

    What is their left to gain after all the costs?

    • Bob Robertson IX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The lives they kill are worth so much more so its worth it to them?

      The Iron Dome is defensive. It kills rockets, not people.

        • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I believe the Iron Dome is literally just a defensive tool though, like it intercepts missiles fired at it

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            to quote bomber Harris: “The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else and nobody was going to bomb them”

            imagine if the Germans had an iron dome