• @RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    88
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I will potentially not buy it then.

    How many times do we have to teach these companies this lesson? Anti-piracy DRM never stops pirates, it only causes harm to legitimate paying customers. Pirates get the objective better experience playing a game with DRM removed because they not only get the game for free, but it performs better than the version people pay for. Why pay money for something that is objectively worse than getting it for free?

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      To be fair denuvo is really effective.

      It usually takes a long ass time for denuvo games to get cracked if at all.

      Last I checked there were only two people cracking denuvo, one who only likes football games and one really crazy lady.

      Also the lack of piracy is most important for publishers around launch and that’s reflected in denuvo’s pricing which IIRC increases substantially after a year or two (this is a fairly recent change)

      So more games have started to remove Denuvo after a while after launch.

      Before they changed it, I believe the publishers got to keep Denuvo at no extra cost if they didn’t change the game or something but now it gets more expensive the further from launch you go

    • Random Dent
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      It’s wild, I’m one of those patient gamer types but there are certain games that I’d make an exception for and buy as soon as they came out, and Civ has been one of those games as far back as I can remember. But this is gonna be the first one I’m not going to bother with. Between this and the absolutely bonkers price, I really can’t justify it. Maybe in a few years when the Denuvo is removed and you can get the full thing for like $40 or so, but no way am I paying $167 CAD for the full edition on day one.

  • @thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    709 months ago

    i mean civ is never really worth buying until they put out a complete edition with all the features they removed so they could slowly sell them back to you as dlc.

    • @WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      I don’t think they really do that. I remember Civ 6 launching with everything 5 had as DLC in base game and the DLCs added new things 5 didn’t have.

      • @Vathsade@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        I don’t think 6 had religion or a bunch of stuff originally, it had less content than 5 at launch (forget the civs, just the mechanics). That was fixed in the first major update.

        I’d expect a year or 2 before we can start seeing 7 become the full game it needs to get to to pass 6.

        • @thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          it was diplomacy that was stripped then re-added this time. in base civ 6 there was no diplomacy. that’s ridiculous. that’s like one of the most core mechanics and win conditions. then when they did add it it was so busted that you’ll often accidentally get a diplo victory on your way to any other victory.

        • @VoterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          6 definitely had religion at launch. IGN actually declared “This game will go down in history as the most fully-featured launch version in the 25-year series.”

          • @thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            that’s a weird thing to say about a game that came out without diplomacy or diplomatic victories. but ign has a long history of overating games from waelthy companies.

            edit: but also, the way that ign feels the need to praise it for being fully featured at launch when it was still missing a base mechanic really helps my point. they always do this. this may actually be the least bad one they’ve ever done. that’s just a low bar. like the 4th least bad release.

            idk man… i guess In today’s market this behavior has become less bad by comparison to everyone else, but I’m not going to ignore the rising temperature of the water in this pot. the whole industry is getting worse. I’m not going to give this company ground to legitimize their greed because the rest of the industry shot past them in shittyness. this was one of the first series to explicitly be scummy with dlc. they helped create the modern landscape of battle passes and gacha bullshit. they were once some of the worst out there…

            • @VoterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              Sure but the fully fleshed out diplomatic victory in Civ V was only added by DLC, it’s not that crazy that the equivalent was a DLC in VI. Beyond that, things like religion, archaeology, and espionage were all DLC features in V but were base game in VI. It was a clear step forward on the whole.

        • @WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Fair enough, I forgot it didn’t launch with the world Congress stuff. It has enough other new stuff and a bunch of features from Civ 5 that at least for me it made up for that being left behind at first.

    • @jorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -149 months ago

      I find this argument really annoying / entitled.

      Are they supposed to increase the scope of every iteration in the series and take an extra few years to make each one, or are they supposed to never release DLC? which would make you happy?

      • @thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I would like it to come out with the same number of win conditions that the previous ones had. diplomacy was a base feature in at least the last 2 games before it. it wasn’t a dlc feature before. they removed it this time, then added it back as dlc. they do shit like that every time.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    339 months ago

    Oh. Well I was excited about Civ 7 right until this moment.

    Anti-tamper = no mods worth your time = only worth playing a handful of times. Also may have trouble working on Linux.

  • @hakase@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    179 months ago

    There hasn’t been a need for a new Civ since IV so I already wasn’t gonna buy it, but now I’m gonna not buy it even harder.

    • @blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Yeah… Civ 1, 2, 3, and 4 were all good - for different reasons. Civ 5 was where the design decisions stopped being about gameplay and started being about maximising profit. Making the game functional and fun was lower priority to making paid DLC. Players buy the buggy and unfinished game… then pay more to fix it piecemeal with the DLC. Such is the power of brands and advertising.

  • SSTF
    link
    fedilink
    39 months ago

    Lords Of The Realm II just keeps winning.

  • @Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    29 months ago

    Thats fine, after 6, didn’t have much hype for the series left, guess this makes it easier to not buy.