• @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s bound to happen. Why waste hours replacing tags when you can just change what the shelf says when the prices change.

    But this article is so pro Walmart it’s crazy.

    Retailers argue that these innovations increase efficiency and reduce costs in an industry known for its slim profit margins.

    Slim profit margins my ass. Walmarts gross profit for the twelve months ending July 31, 2024 was $163.786B,

    • Thurstylark
      link
      fedilink
      English
      489 months ago

      I think the main concern is that this is a step towards normalizing extremely frequent price changes, a la Uber surge pricing.

      • @YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        179 months ago

        That’s exactly what this is. All stores will eventually do this and prices will fluctuate throughout the day.

      • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        And personalized pricing, based on your profile and what they think they can get you to pay.

      • @spizzat2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        So, if I grab an item off the shelf and browse around the store for a while, is the price going to be the price currently displayed or the price when I grabbed it?

        If it’s the current price, what’s the point of a price tag? If I can’t actually know the price until checkout, then showing me the price is kind of a useless bit of data. I also suspect that the “speak to a manager” types would make that a major headache for stores.

        If it’s the price when I grabbed it, how are they keeping track of that? I see two ways of handling that: one requires that you use their app to shop, and the other requires cameras and “machine vision” that are still unreliable, at best. The former seems more likely, but I doubt either is going to sit well with customers.

        Edit: someone pointed out that it might not actually display a price, and you’d have to scan it to get your price. Kind of like the first option, but I think it’s going to turn off less tech savvy customers.

        I haven’t seen that aspect addressed in any articles about the “feature”.

        • @Tabzlock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Take a photo of it, I work with paper but we change our tags frequently. We often have prices changed when a customer reaches checkout. I’ve also had times where a customer came back to check a shelf tag after I just updated it. I honored the previous price those times as I was still holding the tickets but its not a guarantee even in paper stores.

          • @Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            We often have prices changed when a customer reaches checkout.

            I know this isn’t your fault or anything but damn, that seems lightly customer hostile at best, and deeply unethical at worst. It sounds like it should be illegal.

            • @Tabzlock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              I can’t speak internationally or legally but from what I know from friends in similar jobs daily prices changes aren’t uncommon. The reason and when it happens often is normally the start of the day when there is a new batch of tickets. They don’t go up instantly and multiple 100s of tickets normally take a couple hours to get placed depending on how many/busy staff are.

              Main thing is e-ink’s don’t really make this significantly better or worse. I personally think they are neat for the end worker. The problem is that this is allowed or not enforced well.

        • @Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          Even at stores that have this feature, I rarely see people use it. It’s clearly not an experience that people flock to.

          OTOH, on the rare occasion I’ve visited a Walmart in the past 10 years, I have a 100% rate of checkout taking an absurdly long time. Everyone there just seems to accept it like they have no choice.

      • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        I edited in another thought. I agree with that fear, that’s obviously the concern. I didn’t feel the need to repeat it.

    • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      109 months ago

      Slim profit margins my ass. Walmarts gross profit for the twelve months ending July 31, 2024 was $163.786B,

      Walmart has 10.5k locations. 163B divided by 10.5K is about $15.6M per location.

      Jesus, in what world is $15M profits per store location considered a “slim margin”?

    • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      Slim profit margins my ass. Walmarts gross profit for the twelve months ending July 31, 2024 was $163.786B,

      Not to sound flippant, but do you know what gross profit means? They aren’t pocketing all of that. Walmart’s net profit margin is 2.66%, which is minuscule. They make up for that by having enormous volume.

      • gila
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        That’s an expected tradeoff of operating an essential service is the point. It’s not as though their margin is that slim by mistake, or out of goodwill, or bad business sense. It’s meant to lead to the situation where we shop at Walmart not by choice, but in lieu of other options.

        • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          Not really — it’s because nearly everything they sell is highly fungible, and they compete on price. Nobody is willing to pay a premium to shop at Walmart. Twenty years ago you’d have been correct, but they’ve pretty much saturated the market at this point. They’re trying to find profitability in automation rather than adding tons of new stores.

          • gila
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            I’m really meaning the lack of option not to consume fast-moving consumer goods, rather than the option to pay a premium for them elsewhere. When their market position is similar to like an outlet for government rations except for private profit, their net is essentially what was skimmed off the top of free enterprise. 2.66% is just the current maximum amount that is justifiably worth without doing societal harm

            • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              That’s true, but what you describe is pretty much the end state of big-box retail. Amazon is essentially the same, if we exclude AWS. It’s all a race to the bottom. The solution, as always, is to buy direct from smaller producers if possible.

      • @ericjmorey@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You made a good point and I immediately thought that reporting a gross profit dollar amount as an example of how profit margins are not slim as simply inappropriate. And I would have responded myself if you hadn’t. There’s no single dollar figure that can inform anyone about anything useful about the profit margin of a business. A number without context is useless.

      • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Gross profit can be defined as the profit a company makes after deducting the variable costs directly associated with making and selling its products or providing its services.

        Flippant away

        • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Yes, but there are many more expenses associated with running their business beyond simply COGS. Their net income last year was 11B, which is pretty average for a company that size.

          • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            I’ll be completely honest. I don’t care anywhere near enough about the actual number that you do. I looked it up, and that was that. I didn’t write a financial report.

            • @cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              I dislike that you’ve put me in the position of defending Walmart, but don’t you find it rather misleading to imply that they made 163 billion dollars in profit when the real number is less than 10% of that?

  • @Tabzlock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    239 months ago

    Work in retail without e-ink and a lot of the concerns people have here already happen with paper. We do full store paper price tag updates daily, also someone will go around with a scanner making sure prices are up to date with website and print new sheets if not.

    Normal days will consist of 3-5 new batches of tickets with the full store update batch containing normally ~10-20 a4 sheets. This isn’t a huge store either I imagine most wallmarts would have more products.

    The prices already update super frequently and e-inks don’t really change that. It basically just cuts out the printing and placing, the person running around with the scanner now updates prices.

    I think for workers they are nice as they reduce the chance of paper cuts and the back and leg pain from changing the 100s of bottom shelf tags.

    The benefit for stores is they likely don’t need to hire as many people, less training and possibly reduced material cost over time as the paper would probably add up.

    • @_edge@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      I’m not worried about e-ink price tags. Aldi has them. I’m worry if it says, use your phone to find special offers only for you.

    • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      109 months ago

      Yeah these have existed for a while.

      I think the only thing new is that walmart previously talked about actually implementing “on demand pricing” and now that they’re adding digital price tags they could actually do it.

      • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think this will be potentially be a good thing (at first) as you won’t have people wasting their life away just endlessly walking around the store updating the price of every individual item for 40 hours a week.

        Things will get messy when they start price gouging based on current inventory, weather, holidays or emergency situations.

        Things will get deeply dystopian if they start scanning customers as they enter and change the price based on their skin color, gender, clothing, or estimated net worth.

        • tmyakal
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          or estimated net worth

          Walmart credit card. They don’t need to estimate when you willingly provide it.

  • @Midnitte@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    69 months ago

    It’s not just Walmart - the entire grocery sector is doing it. The potential for abuse is certainly not low.

    The new labels allow employees to change prices as often as every ten seconds. - NPR

    • It would be a crying shame if someone were to figure out a way to force those e ink displays to refresh fast enough that it kills the batteries on those things…

  • @BurningRiver@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    49 months ago

    Obviously the way to combat this is to organize dozens or more people who just walk around, load up shopping carts, then leave the store without buying anything. They can pay people to put everything back.

  • @PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49 months ago

    As long as they are still sending out flyers with stuff you buy you are okay. Also, if you already knew the price range of your regularly shopped goods, you know something is off. Superstore is already using digital tags. And you can just pull out your phone and take pictures.

    Lastly, it should be put into law so you can’t increase price during the day. Going down is fine, but no going down and then going up again for peak hour. Stores can set whatever price they want to sell before opening. (for those non-regulated things)

    • @ericjmorey@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      New Jersey has a law like that for gas. Can only increase the price one time per day. But ut doesn’t apply to all gass stations, just ones on the highway rest areas.

  • @lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    29 months ago

    Those have existed here for a long time and we got none of those problems.

    • @Overzeetop@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      Yet. Infrastructure on this scale moves slowly and the transparentness of pricing changes on short time lines in physical stores is hard to track. It exists in emergency economies - we call it price gouging - but that’s usually quite obvious. The idea of dynamic pricing has existed forever - hotels, airline flights, movie tickets, taxi rides, even electric rates. As technology advances it offers the opportunity to use the technology to shorten the time window for pricing changes more and more. An extra two tenths of a percent profit seems like a trivial amount. Amazon and Walmart combined for more than a trillion dollars in sales last year. 0.2% is a very non-trivial $2 Billion. If it becomes available, it will be exploited.