• @jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Sweet, I’ve been thinking about getting another EV. Which one is it in? I’ve got some time to go do test drives this weekend.

        • @realitista@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1310 months ago

          They said it would be in Lexus first if you read the article. There are power banks on the market with solid state batteries today if you like.

            • Pelicanen
              link
              fedilink
              English
              910 months ago

              Not sure if you’re joking but

              Both Toyota and Samsung have vowed to begin mass solid-state battery production in 2027, and Toyota, too, advised that it will be installing them in premium electric cars under the Lexus brand first.

              From the article.

              • @realitista@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                310 months ago

                Not only that but they are actually shipping batches to automakers for testing already.

              • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                310 months ago

                I was responding to the comment that said “But now it’s actually being produced and put into products.”

                Toyota is notorious for putting out FUD when it comes to EVs. They bet on hydrogen and missed the boat with EVs - and it shows. To prevent people from buying EVs from their competitors, they’ve been promoting new miracle battery tech for a while now. Why buy a Hyundai with 300 miles of range when a Toyota with 600 miles of range is just around the corner?

                The fact of the matter is they’re not producing these batteries right now in a car that you or I can buy. When the top comment joked about new battery tech being out, it’s because there’s a new article about this every other day. Toyota doesn’t want you to buy an EV right now, so expect articles like this for years to come.

  • @Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    910 months ago

    How about phones? Surely Samsung would put their own new battery tech in their own phones right?

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    210 months ago

    Wow! A battery that can magically transport itself 600 miles! What a world we live in!

    Or, you know, it’s a no sense claim with made up numbers.

    I have been seeing multiple battery tech claims per week, ever week, for the past 30 years and well over 99% of the claims are bull. Dumb claims like this battery goes 600 miles" tells you all you need to know.

    Show me the money, then we’ll talk

    • TheHarpyEagle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      According to Samsung SDI’s VP, automakers are interested in its solid-state battery packs because they are smaller, lighter, and much safer than what’s in current electric cars. Apparently, they are also rather expensive to produce, since it warns that they will first go into the “super premium” EV segment of luxury electric cars that can cover more than 600 miles on a charge.

      Apparently not, though this is all marketing speak

  • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -24
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It doesn’t matter. Cars are still an unsustainable and inequitable grift destroying the planet. Just ban cars and make a million light EVs instead.

    • @jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Vehicles will always have specific use cases, it’s just that most of North America’s infrastructure is designed to accommodate vehicles with everything else being designed around that, put in as an afterthought or just not thought of in the first place (like cycling infrastructure). So people are using these machines for things that are outside their use case, as it has been for almost a century.

      As things are right now, people would probably die if cars were outright banned. It’s kind of funny how important personal vehicles have become and as such kind of scary how necessary they are (it’s a bit of a paradox, isn’t it?). To ban cars there first needs to be a good replacement option like well connected rail lines or cycling only roads (or at least protected bicycle lanes). These take time, money, resources and, most of all, political will to create. For most of the developed world money and resources aren’t exactly an issue, the issue is politics that lock up those resources for vehicles.

      I.e., funding for my cities major bicycle route that serves 1000+ people everyday is still only funded by my regions parks and recreation board which doesn’t get enough money to maintain it properly. Even though it’s really great, I can’t use it after dark because there aren’t any lights until I get to a shared route and there are a few bridges that are so uneven I have to walk across.

      North America has to undo multiple decades of relentless car-centred development and the prevailing political climate means that will happen piecemeal at a municipal level, street by street, year by year. I personally don’t want to wait for that though, so I’m learning Dutch.