• dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1631 year ago

    Shit like this is exactly why competition is of utmost importance. The internet was never meant to be single-handedly controlled by a corporation with private interests, and more importantly, private pockets

    • @asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same thing that happened with the internet also happened with capitalism. It’s like you need some regulation to ensure competition. It could have been so awesome if we had what we were promised.

    • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Calling it the “Googlenet” now. The rest of us that don’t suck Google dick can stay on the actual Internet.

  • @BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1231 year ago

    Manifest V2 phase out is a big deal, as Google is pushing towards Manifest 3 only. Google’s version of Manifest 3 is hobbled by removing WebRequest blocking which breaks privacy and ad blocking tools - an obvious benefit to Google as an Ad and data harvesting company.

    Firefox is implementing Manifest 3 with WebRequest blocking, as well as supporting Google’s hobbled version declarativeNetRequest to allow compatibility with chrome extensions.

    • @rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      591 year ago

      As far as I know there is no plan to phase out Manifest V2 at Mozilla. As long as V2 and V3 are active in parallel it shouldn’t have a negative Impact on adblockers etc.

        • @Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          20
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/05/14/manifest-v3-updates/

          We also wanted to take this opportunity to address a couple common questions we’ve been seeing in the community, specifically around the webRequest API and MV2:

          1. The webRequest API is not on a deprecation path in Firefox
          2. Mozilla has no current plans to deprecate MV2 as mentioned in our previous MV3 update

          That said, I believe Firefox users have gotten a lot of benefits by having extensions made that work in both Firefox and Chromium-based browsers. I don’t believe there will still be as much effort for a Firefox-only extension but I believe there will be a sufficient number of motivated users and developers to still develop blockers and other extensions that take advantage of Firefox continuing to support MV2 and webRequest.

    • z3rOR0ne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Yeah, it’s still worrisome. This makes Firefox a lynchpin for whether ad blocking works for the foreseeable future on the whole web.

  • Frellwit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    65
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • On June 3rd, Chrome(ium) users will start being informed that their MV2 extensions will soon stop to function. uBlock Origin (and others) will lose the “Featured” badge.
    • The remaining MV2 extensions will be gradually disabled in the “coming months”, with the last deadline being the beginning of next year. (Expect that uBO will probably not last that long).

    What options do you have if you still want to use uBlock Origin?

    • Firefox (and up to date forks) have no plans to end support for the webrequest API that uBO requires.
    • Brave browser will allow MV2 extensions for now. I still have no info on if they are going to use their own store or require manual installation/updating of MV2 extensions.
    • If you use Chrome. By enabling enterprise policy ExtensionManifestV2Availability, you should be able to extend support till June 2025.
    • uBlock Origin Lite (uBOL) is a MV3 extension that is much more limited than uBO and is not intended to be a replacement for uBO. These limitations are described in detail in the FAQ for uBOL: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)
    • @sealhaslupus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      for those who come and read through these comments, on top of considering not using a chromium-based browser, you could also:

      • configure your own DNS resolver e.g. NextDNS
      • go further and use a fork of firefox e.g. librewolf
      • @sverit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Unfortunately DNS blocking is not nearly as powerful as an adblock extension which can manipulate the DOM and CSS directly.

        • @sealhaslupus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          many people here parrot the same things relentlessly. there is no issue with choosing firefox as your primary driver. every user here can decide on what they want for themselves.

          i am offering other options as the suggestions in this thread (and threads like these) are homogenous.

          Firefox has telemetry settings built-in which you can switch off. LibreWolf strips the telemetry options away and focuses on obfuscating your browser fingerprint.

          • @nixcamic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Yeah it’s just that I feel like if someone is still using freaking Chrome in 2024 then asking them to use something even more obscure than FF might be a bridge too far.

            • @sealhaslupus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              LibreWolf is just a fork of Firefox (one of many) which tries to improve its privacy features.

              I am not asking anyone to use this, just merely offering an alternate option. Everyone who accesses the internet has used a browser. What makes a difference for the average user is the GUI and UX.

              If you use vanilla Firefox and don’t tweak the settings, often your DNS will be resolved by either Google, Cloudflare or your ISP.

              There is no perfect solution, only optimal ones.

  • @thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 year ago

    We’ve always been clear that the goal of Manifest V3 is to protect existing functionality while improving the security, privacy, performance and trustworthiness of the extension ecosystem as a whole. We appreciate the collaboration and feedback from the community that has allowed us - and continues to allow us - to constantly improve the extensions platform.

    “We’ve always been clear that the goal of our remote-unlockable front door product is to protect your family while improving the efficiency and safety of our field reconnaissance and repo unit. We appreciate your feedback that you really hate unannounced in-home data gathering incursions, and we are integrating that feedback going forward as we work to improve your interactions with our team. See you soon!”

    • @Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Firefox finally got HDR support, so now I have zero reason to use a Chromium-Based browser anymore. Kept Ungoogled Chromium around just for streaming video; uninstalled it yesterday.

    • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      There wasn’t any h265 support until recent nightlies for windows… so there is that issue. Which is important for watching movies ore even some NVR / Security cameras these days for anything 4K or higher.

  • @anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    Considering the community behind uBlock origin has no financial incentive, why are they still developing for chrome and manifest v3 while google keeps pulling off anti consumer and anti-adblock tactics, shouldn’t they just drop chrome and orient people to use firefox or one of its derivatives.

    • Kilgore Trout
      link
      fedilink
      English
      491 year ago

      gorhill already strongly suggests to use Firefox, but to drop Google Chrome altogether would leave millions of people stranded.

          • @anlumo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Good post. Also, in the case of GitHub, one major reason for me for using it is that this is the first place a potential employer will look at to see my work. They won’t delve into the depths of a random git hosting service nobody has ever heard about.

            • Kilgore Trout
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              You just need to put a link on your resume, that way they will know about it.

          • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            True, at the end of the day it does come down to number of users, unfortunately. More users does mean more potential help/contributions. I just wish more people would switch to Firefox or another non-Chromium browser.

            • Kilgore Trout
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              The author’s goal, laterally, is to spread Free Software to as many users as possible.

              We’ll never convince anyone that out fight for Freedom is good, by circlejerking.

        • Shurimal
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          As much as I like Firefox/Librewolf, Vivaldi still has the upper hand in UI/UX. Workspaces, more feature-rich sidebar, one-click access to recently closed tabs right there in the tab bar, speed dial, tab stacks and other QoL stuff that makes just enough difference for me that I can’t really daily-drive any other browsers. Until FF reaches feature parity (it’s getting close, but still isn’t quite there yet) I don’t see myself migrating anytime soon. Quess I’ll just need to rely more on AdGuard DNS and Vivaldi’s built-in adblocker if uBlock becomes neutered on Chromium…

  • @LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    Many times stupid web pages don’t load… Call support and I’m told it only works in chrome.

    Can’t get away from it

  • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    It becomes impossible to block ads in all browsers new forks will be made and the features we want will happen. The bar to spin and maintain a new browser is high but it’s not impossible on there are a lot of people that want this

    • @fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Sorry mate I think this is a little naive.

      I suspect that the bar to “spin and maintain a new browser” is so high as to be impossible.

      The resources required to keep firefox afloat are huge. It’s not something a few like minded individuals can do on their weekends.

    • Kilgore Trout
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Independent Web browsers in active development which use their own engine and (aim to) support modern Web standards:


      That’s it.

  • @hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    My chrome phase-out finished years ago (though technically I was using a chromium-based browser and not chrome itself). Good riddance to that trash. Firefox all the way!

  • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Internet is dominated by Netscape, then crushed by MS giving its browser away… Firefox steps in for a while and is great but starts to suck / get slow, google steps in people start to shift to google, everyone is on google… Wonder who steps in next.

    • @bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      There’s a lot more vendor lock in than there has been in the past. I don’t see there being a major change without legislation. It’s still too early to see how the EU’s DMA will affect market share, but it’s probably the best hope, even if it is limited to a few geographical areas.

      • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        There’s a lot more vendor lock in than there has been in the past. I don’t see there being a major change without legislation

        LOL no… ActiveX on IE was the ultimate lock in, and that is gone now… Also we have A LOT of chromium based clones that don’t have these restrictions… It will still be a popularity contest.

        Firefox however is limited by its in ability / unwillingness to license or implement some DRM features / Codecs which kind of sucks.

        • @bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          An even bigger restriction is how iOS just blocks all competing browser engines. It doesn’t matter what sites do or don’t require. If a site is broken in Safari, I just have to go use a different device. On all other operating systems you do have a bit more options, but they all pretty aggressively push you into using the manufacturer’s choice.

          • Sent from my iPhone
          • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            True… but you can install content blocker plugins on iOS now from the app store and as far as mobile goes Android offer an alternative.

  • @BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    I assume with chromium being open source that there will be an alternative compiled version without this nonsense?

    • @bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      That’s how it works for now, but eventually the code itself will be removed from chromium, not just disabled. At that point they’d have to maintain a large patch set reimplementing it, which would be extremely time intensive to maintain and keep secure.