• Pietson
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    Have we gotten past the point if irreparable damage? Yes. Does that mean it’s pointless to reduce further damage as much as possible? Not even a little.

    • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      We will not be able to reduce the impact unless we completely dismantle capitalism. And we frankly don’t have a long time to do it if the goal is to reduce the impact before we’re all dead.

    • Bipta
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      We have to amputate the hand, so we might as well take off the whole arm. – humanity right now

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I think we need more positive messaging on the whole thing. We’re not just fighting climate change but make life more healthy and pleasant for everybody.

    • Sabata11792
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Positive messaging hasn’t done anything and its a polite way to be a push over. Start showing destroyed houses and dead bodies. Make pople look at the suffering without pussyfooting a feelgood message.

      • People don’t like that and choose to look away. Blind ignorance is how we got to where we are today. The damages are irreversible in our current lifetime now.

        The only viable solution these days are systemic ones where the government is actually doing its job and governing the damages done by larger companies.

        But we’re so fucked that if that were to be a universal law applied by every government by every country, then it will it take 100 or so years to get back to square one :)

    • @ex_06@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      This is a very interesting topic that would require a lot of discussions

      In my opinion, we (obviously) need both BUT the messages leveraging fear will still be more spread thanks to algorithms.

      So the issue here is more like “how do we reach the people that need more positive messages” rather than “we need more positive messages”

      In the end, a lot of people just can’t get out of their own hamster wheel unless hard helped offline by people close to them.

      It’s also true that we don’t need masses to react, just enough people… So well, as I said, it’s food for thought that requires discussions and actions, there is no end synthesis to this comment of mine :)

  • jlow (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    For how many decades has she been saying it? (I’m not saying she’s not telling the truth, I’m saying we need to finally listen to her.)

  • Hanrahan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    The problem is human, it’s us and we’re not taking anything seriously. How much more ? April was the single largest increase in monthly ppm ever recorded

    The climates not the problem, we have any number of solutions. Lots of really easy stuff we’re not doing, like not flying and cycling and not driving cars, not replacing meat eating pets when they pass. Alll too inconvenient ? Yes ? Well that just makes my point. We assume our entitlment can continue with a few tweaks, well, we can fool ourselves and each other but nature cannot be fooled.

    Ask a behavioral expert not a climate scientiest. Can’t even get people to stop flying to a Taylor Swift concert or a football match what hope ?

    Fuck hope, Plan for the worst.

  • @Username02@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    We can afford to be a bit more hopeful if the Dems win the next election, but until then… save yourself some mental health crisis… don’t think too much about it.