• Boozilla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    691 year ago

    I will think about this every time we have a meeting to discuss the stupid “shame and train” faux phishing attacks they run on us at work.

    Pro-Tip: If you set up the right kind of filtering you’ll never see those stupid things. (Fight club rules).

    • @ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      461 year ago

      The one they use at my work is extra silly, as it adds an extra email header saying it’s coming from a phishing campaign

      • @frickineh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        441 year ago

        Ours do that too. It’s so obvious that I’m not sure if they think we’re all stupid, except then I remember that some of my coworkers actually are stupid, so it’s probably aimed at them.

        • @cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          481 year ago

          except then I remember that some of my coworkers actually are stupid, so it’s probably aimed at them.

          I work in IT and have done these campaigns, if you’re on Lemmy, you’re probably not the target audience lmao

          • @LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            241 year ago

            There’s an older guy in my group who rants and raves about how all the new training is a waste of time. Discrimination, harassment, safety, information security, all of it. But he specifically hates the fraud and phishing training.

            He’s the only one in our group that has failed any of the test emails.

        • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 year ago

          I’ve worked with a dude for years who I would consider smart both technically and non-technically. One time we got an email at work with an attachment that was something like “microsoft_update.exe.txt”. The email said “due to a technical limitation on the email system, this file needs to be renamed to drop the .txt and executed to apply a critical to your computer.”

          It was, in my mind, such an obvious phishing attempt that I laughed out loud and said “who the fuck would ever fall for this?” Then my coworker popped his head over the cube wall and said “WAIT WHAT? We weren’t supposed to run that?!”

          Fortunately, the security team sat nearby and heard the whole thing and rushed over to quarantine his PC

            • @groet@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              101 year ago

              You DONT want to turn it off. Digital forensics work WAAAAAAY better if you have a memory dump of the system. And all the memory is lost if you turn it off. Even if the virus ran 10h ago and the program has long stoped running, there will most likely still be traces in the RAM. Like a hard drive, simply deleting something in RAM doesn’t mean it is gone. As long as that specific area was not written over later it will still hold the same contenta. You can sometimes find memory that belonged to a virus days or even weeks after the infection if the system was never shut down. There is so much information in ram that is lost when the power is turned off.

              You want to 1: quarantine from network (don’t pull the cable at the system, but firewall it at the switch if possible) 2: take a full copy of the RAM 2.5: read out bitlocker keys if the drive is encrypted. 3: turn off and take a bitwise copy of the hard drive or just send the drive + memory dump to the forensics team. 4: get coffee

          • Boozilla
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            Even a smart person can have a bad day / moment of weakness. If you are super busy / stressed out and some email comes that looks like a bullshit request from HR or IT or whatever, it can be tempting to just try to knock it off your plate real quick so you can get back to whatever fire you were fighting.

            My tactic these days is I pretty much don’t click on ANYTHING in an email, so it’s an ingrained habit. If it’s a link to something, it’s usually one I can navigate to myself using my browser. If it’s an attachment, we use a file sharing system that stores these so I can just go to that and see what’s in there.

            It’s inconvenient, and you don’t always have these work-around options, but by trying to make into an automatic habit, it has saved me a couple of times.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        That’s really funny. It’s like you work for Dunder-Mifflin.

        • borari
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Damn. I’ve scripted out the entire process of verifying an owned domain in a hosted mail providers system, deploying the ec2 infrastructure, and installing and configuring gophish for a campaign, along with tearing everything down.

          That header thing gophish adds is a default option that you can override by just setting that header to an empty string. Whoever runs campaigns for your employer either wants to make it easy for you to pass or doesn’t care about their job at all.

          I’ve done it in the context of red team/adversary emulation campaigns before though, so the opsec needed to be a bit tighter than the mandatory phishing awareness stuff i guess.

      • @bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Lmao, the other day I had to whitelist some domains used for phishing training emails in the anti-phishing software we use just so they wouldn’t get nuked, then I had to whitelist them in another anti-phishing software so they wouldn’t have - huge red header injected on the top of the email body warning the user it was phishing.

    • @Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      My company is using some tool to generate those kinds of false scam emails every few weeks, so I created a rule in Outlook that if the header contains the word “gophish”, it put a label “lol phishing” on it, so I know to just delete them…

    • @cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      except too many companies take that extra step of being annoying:

      • you get a write up if you fall for the phishing
      • you get a write up if you don’t fall for it but also fail to report it
      • you get a write up if you don’t fall for it and do report it but don’t use the correct report form
      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        you also fail if you use the right form but don’t staple a cover sheet for the tps form followup.

      • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        We’re supposed to forward the spear fishing emails to IT but I always just report as spam and go about my day. Was only nervous the first couple times I ignored an obvious internal phishing test but apparently they don’t care if we don’t fall for it.

        • BubbleMonkey
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Mine was like that too so I just deleted them and moved on. I sat right next to the security team and would thus know when they were going out, so they gave no shits as long as you didn’t fall for it.

          It also helped that my team was the only in the company that didn’t really get email. Everyone else got hundreds a day (no joke, they used way too many mail lists) and we got maybe 5-10, all internal or auto-generated, so everything was super obvious, and IT was well aware of this.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Where I work, they haven’t taken it that far yet. But I would not be surprised if they go to that in the future. The email rules / filters can still help with it.

      • @criticon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Yeah my company sets a goal of how many you need to report every year, if you don’t then you need to take mandatory training (same if you fail and click on a link)

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        The right email rule can make that easier, too. Hee hee

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        The usual “dance, monkey, dance” from corporate.

        • @IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          The Internet: fuck these companies for leaking my data.

          Also the Internet: fuck taking these classes on security and forcing me to reread policies and sops.

          Fucked if you do, fucked if you didn’t.

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            This makes me wonder just how awful it would be if we didn’t have these dumb classes and obvious test emails.

          • deaf_fish
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            Hey, if running a business was easy, everyone would be doing it. We can’t have that.

    • @Turbofish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Ugh. I got one of them recently and clicking on it and hitting report as spam apparently registers as me having interacted with the email so I have to do the security course again.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        It’s glitchy AF. There’s a known bug where it can report you if you simply preview the email, too. In some environments, anyway.

      • Boozilla
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It varies depending on your email client and the fake phishing service / implementation. (Sorry, I hate non-specific answers like this, too). For me, all I had to do was add an Outlook rule that looks for a certain keyword in the email header. The keyword is a weird/unique string that’s only associated with the fake phishing company. If that word is anywhere in the email header, my rule chucks it into a folder where I just ignore it. Your client should let you view the header / raw email and you can look for a pattern that way.

        It’s a pretty safe rule as far as email rules go. The only risk I can think of is that it could lull me into complacency, but working for the man does that, anyway. I’ve been getting away with it for over a year, and it’s nice not seeing the dumbass fake phishing things. Note that we are not mandated to report them, but we get assigned extra training if we click on any links in them. Your employer may have different rules.

    • @Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      281 year ago

      Summer2024 Autumn2024 Spring2024 Winter2024

      Are the most common passwords for regular employees. Update the year with the current or previous one.

      Source: I was in IT.

      P.s. if you have access to the physical location. Look for post-it notes under the keyboard.

    • deaf_fish
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      That proves you were the one that was targeted. It doesn’t say anything about your intentions.

      You could have had the best intentions and just missed the signs that it was a malicious email. Or you could have intentionally clicked on it out of spite.

      If I knew my employee did it out of spite, I would fire them. Otherwise, it falls under the shit happens category, try to do better next time.

      • @teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        If was so miserable at a job that I thought giving passwords away to random people was a good idea, I would hope that I had moved on long before.