• @BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Something about this is very bizarre to me. On the one hand, offering ownership to heavy users sounds like a great idea, albeit one quite counter to Reddit’s demeanor and behavior towards users over the last couple years. On the other hand, isn’t this kind of like Netflix offering shares to the subscribers who stream the most content? Just because you use a service more than anyone else doesn’t necessarily mean you should be invested in the company. I dunno, I have mixed feelings about this, but I’m generally skeptical that Reddit ever has its users best interests in mind.

    • @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      isn’t this kind of like Netflix offering shares to the subscribers who stream the most

      Not really, because a Netflix subscriber is purely a consumer of content. Someone who posts on Reddit is contributing real value which can be profited from.

      A better comparison is the difference between a “Bank” and a “Credit Union”. A bank has customers and shareholders. The shareholders profit by selling services to customers. With a Credit Union your customers are your shareholders.

      Credit Unions don’t sell services… they use the account holders money to pay for services which provided to account holders. They also use the account holder’s money to invest and earn profits. Those profits are returned (in full, minus operational costs) to the account holders in the form of interest rates based on the amount of money in each account (banks do that too, but credit unions usually have better interest rates). PS: if you have an account with a bank, you should probably consider closing it and find a good Credit Union… especially in the modern world where transactions are online and you don’t have as much need for cash/etc (banks tend to have more branches).

      It seems like Reddit is planning to be somewhere in between. With shareholders, and customers, and “customers who are also shareholders”. Maybe it’s something the we should consider over here in the fediverse… because I certainly don’t trust reddit’s leadership to do anything good with the content I provided for them (which is why I deleted it…)

  • @adaveinthelife@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    What implications will this have for people who post other people’s content for profit? Karma being worthless was the only thing keeping the whole model in a grey area, I thought.

  • FenrirIII
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Still don’t regret deleting my account. Millions in karma through years of sharing interesting things. But Reddit has become a cesspool and this only proves it is getting worse.

  • @LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I hope that one guy with both broken arms gets some of that sweet IPO action. That guy was a fucking legend

    • @ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      The theory is that the issue price is less than what the stock will be at shortly after IPO. That’s why principals get excited about IPOs. You’re issued some vested shares and often have the privilege of purchasing more shares at the issue price before launch, then it goes up, you profit.

      Of course, sometimes that goes hilariously wrong, see Facebook.

  • @T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Wonder if this would mean that Reddit might end up going the way of Quora, when they did their question monetisation scheme. Since users might be incentivised to become big by posting a lot, and replying a lot.

    Might be interesting to see if this might mean a massive surge in reposts, or just a big increase in the amount of posting as people fight for those spots, trying to be funny/up voted enough for it.