• @sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    This is what I wondered about a few months ago when people were saying that ChatGPT was a ‘google killer’. So we just have ‘AI’ read websites and sum them up, vs. visiting websites? Why would anyone bother putting information on a website at that point?

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      We are barreling towards this issue. StackOverflow for example has crashing viewer numbers. But an AI isn’t going to help users navigate and figure out a new python library for example, without data to train on. I’ve already had AIs straight up hallucinate about functions in R that actually don’t exist. It seems to happen primarily in the newer libraries, probably with fewer posts on stackexchange about them

  • @TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    Thank you to Arc for reminding me how much I enjoy browsing the internet and its many unique pages — these soulless generated results are the opposite of what I want.

    • @fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      More and more of the Internet is being ai generated, so you’ll get to choose from a soulless summary or soulless SEO spam.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      If I want to get them quick, I’d take them soulless and summarized.

  • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    How does it help creators? Without them there is no web…” After all, if a web browser sucked out all information from web pages without users needing to actually visit them, why would anyone bother making websites in the first place

    This reminds me of when Mozilla was 0.9 and the web was just taking the baton from Gopher.

    When Ben suggests there would be no web without monetization, he seems to forget WHEN HE WAS THERE before the sellout.

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Well people who make content are already suffering for a collapse of ad prices. News sites are shutting down left and right. Not everything is about money, but they need revenue or external support to continue operating.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        People who make content for money are suffering from a collapse in ad prices. There are people who make content because they enjoy making and sharing content.

        • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          That’s not what we’re talking about… we’re talking about news. Real news, with investigative journalism costs money. You need to pay for people to be on the ground, travel expense, etc.

  • @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago
    • We create WWW, where everyone can freely put things on and discuss anything.

    • Oh no! But what about the profits?

    • We create this summarize tool to quickly get knowleadge without always needing to peek deeper into text.

    • Oh no! But what about the profits?

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      It’s not about profit. It’s about being compensated for one’s hard work which was appropriated without permission by giant corporations

      • TheMurphy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Lesson #1 on the Internet.

        Put something on it, expect it to be there forever. You never own whatever you put out there. Both text, pictures nor video.

        Maybe companies should realise this too.