Bluetreefrog@lemmy.worldM to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoAskLemmy temporarily closedmessage-squaremessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1194arrow-down1message-squareAskLemmy temporarily closedBluetreefrog@lemmy.worldM to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square30linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDavel23@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up20·2 years agoThat would still allow links to be posted. Better than allowing image posts, but not a complete solution.
minus-squaremaegul (he/they)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·2 years agoIt prevents concerns about hosting CSAM posted by someone else. A categorical improvement I’d say. But yes, nothing’s perfect.
minus-squaretesteronious@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down6·2 years agoYou’re right. I thought of another idea: use karma to decide who can post links, images and/or videos. 50 general karma for links, 100 for pictures, you get the idea.
That would still allow links to be posted. Better than allowing image posts, but not a complete solution.
It prevents concerns about hosting CSAM posted by someone else. A categorical improvement I’d say. But yes, nothing’s perfect.
You’re right. I thought of another idea: use karma to decide who can post links, images and/or videos. 50 general karma for links, 100 for pictures, you get the idea.