• blazera
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    If you want to do the maths, the maximum one can possibly earn in Spotify royalties is $0.003 a stream. It doesn’t add up to a living wage for most artists.

    And now, to make matters far worse, starting in 2024 Spotify will stop paying anything at all for roughly two-thirds of tracks on the platform. That is any track receiving fewer than 1,000 streams over the period of a year.

    So if my maths are right, this means people not getting paid…are people that would make less than 3 dollars in a whole year?

    • admiralteal
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Which really illuminates how fucked it is that they aren’t paying those people.

      These tiny artists earning barely anything are evidently a major enough cost sector that it’s worth Spotify just telling them to get fucked. Playing their content is evidently significantly important to Spotify, but not enough to justify an annual check that isn’t even enough to buy a beer.

      • blazera
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        With hits that low, youre basically just advocating for UBI at that point, you cant expect pay for every little amateur hobby folks have.

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          What they’re actually advocating for is dividing each user’s pot by their listens.

          If a user primarily listens to a handful of small bands, why shouldn’t their cut go to those bands, rather than being thrown into a big pool to be diluted? At first glance they’d be similar, but they’re arguing that if you do the math out they aren’t.

        • @Prunebutt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          People want to listen to it tough, don’t they? Don’t these amateur musicians provide a service that people value?

        • admiralteal
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          To be clear, what I said is Spotify should be sending them their annual several dollar checks. They shouldn’t be allowed to just trim away that cost entirely because the artists are small and Spotify wants more profits.

          And what you’re saying is that they shouldn’t get anything because it’s “just a hobby”.

          Fuck you, seriously.

          • blazera
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Like, i dont think i deserve any money for getting some thousands of views of my art. I think im getting paid about how much money im making the platforms its on, which is nothing. Im not yet good enough to get a job making art, or to sell my art instead of making it freely viewable.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Any track, not any artist. You could have a hundred tracks getting hundreds of streams a piece. Maximum before cutoff would be about $3/track. Not a ton but could be hundreds of dollars. And combining that from dozens to thousands of artists potentially in that boat.