• hh93
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        So what’s the Alternative?

        Hamas made the hospital into a legitimate target in a war by using it like that.

        Can’t evacuate, can’t bomb, can’t go in on foot - why are people always saying what they don’t want but never what the Alternative is?

        Should Hamas be rewarded for using their most vulnerable civilians as a shield like this?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          Look, setting aside the whole human shields argument; that’s wholly irrelevant here. We’re talking sniper fire. Like the one where you take aim, go “I have a clear shot” and shoot. The idea of “there are Hamas operatives in this building so it’s okay” only works (I mean it doesn’t but if you assume it does) when you can’t choose your targets; a soldier holding a sniper and taking individual shots isn’t that.

      • @galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        This is why all those arguments about foot soldiers being the more ethical option were complete ignorance in my opinion. Not in a city.

        • @anteaters@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The actual complaint behind that demand has always been “not enough jews are dying that’s not fair”