While Take-Two is riding high on their announcement that a GTA 6 trailer is coming, its CEO has some…interesting ideas on how much video games could cost, part of a contingent of executives that believe games are underpriced, given their cost, length or some combination of the two.
So I should have paid about $5000 to Tencent because I played League of Legends?
Absolute dogshit. Nobody owns rights to the output of my attention span. Nobody gets to tap my wallet like it’s a tree.
Tap. Tap. It’s not working.
Way to completely miss the point.
Nobody is saying that you should be paying minimum $1/hr, I’m saying that if I’m getting less playtime than equates to $1/hr I haven’t gotten my moneys worth and I don’t find that the game would be worth buying.
Oh heck. How did I miss that this wasn’t another subscription thing like Unity? I’m hearing old adages during a weird time.
Just because someone has some criteria that they use to judge value for money doesn’t mean that you have to follow it…