“No one is looking at us or the extent of this disaster or the crimes that we are experiencing in Gaza,” he said. Still holding his microphone, he slid off his flak jacket marked with the word PRESS and unstrapped his helmet.

“These protection jackets and helmets don’t protect us,” he said, flinging the equipment to the ground. “Nothing protects journalists. … We lose our lives for no reason.”

  • V17
    link
    fedilink
    -192 years ago

    If that’s the case why won’t Israel let civilians cross the border into Israel to prevent their murder?

    Whether you agree with Israeli attacks or not, obviously the answer to this is because it’s impossible to filter out Hamas terrorists, which is the main thing they’re trying to prevent.

    • TinyPizzaOP
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      Your right, best to kill them all then. What do you agree with btw?

      • V17
        link
        fedilink
        -102 years ago

        Your right, best to kill them all then.

        Where did you get that?

        What do you agree with btw?

        I’m not happy with what Israel is doing. But I don’t know of a better way to get rid of Hamas either. And I’m convinced that if we want a free Palestine and a working two state solution, freeing it from Hamas has to be the first step without which no sustainable situation with Israel can ever be achieved.

        • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 years ago

          I’m sure this will work about as well as the US attempt to get rid of the Taliban. Or as well as any of the other instances in the past of trying to get rid of an ideological group through violence.

          It doesn’t work. It makes everything worse. It radicalizes survivors and kills lots of innocent people.

          Some day maybe humanity will collectively abandon these cycles of hatred and violence played out over decades. But I doubt it.

          • V17
            link
            fedilink
            -72 years ago

            You have a point, but it’s not really the same thing and there’s a very good recent counter-example too. ISIS was effectively dealt with despite being spread out over a much larger area. Taliban won, but it had a whole huge country to work in and was nowhere near as violent as Hamas, so it had more support. Gaza is tiny in comparison, blocked on all sides and neighbors of Israel don’t want anything to do with them either, even if they don’t like Israel. There is also at least some alternative in Fatah, which didn’t lose the 2005 elections by that much.

            Imo it’s clearly possible to get rid of Hamas, though I’m not making any claims about the probability that it will happen.

            Mostly, I don’t really see an alternative. Some radical action needed to be taken because anything else would be interpreted as a clear proof that large terrorist attacks against civilians work, and Hamas should continue committing them. You cannot appease someone whose reason for existence is violence. And keeping Hamas sort of in check, only killing or capturing the worst terrorists, which is what was being done in the last two decades, clearly did not work either.

            • TinyPizzaOP
              link
              fedilink
              112 years ago

              You don’t see any alternative to the slaying of people in a 10 to 1 ratio in what is an offensive reprisal attack? I mean Machiavelli would agree with you.

        • TinyPizzaOP
          link
          fedilink
          112 years ago

          I should have put an /s there I guess. You don’t know a better way than genocide? If the treatment kills the host then it is not in fact a cure.

          • V17
            link
            fedilink
            -52 years ago

            If Israel wanted to kill all people in Gaza, they could just carpet bomb them without ever stepping a foot in. The only reason to do a ground invasion that will inevitably bring a ton of Israeli casualties is to reduce civilian deaths.

          • @5BC2E7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -8
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You seem to be implying that israelis are not people or that their lives are less valuable.

            Edit: you should look the definition of imply in the dictionary. responding that you didn’t say something you implied is not a valid argument.

            • TinyPizzaOP
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              where did I say that? Must be hard juggling a victim complex with 4000 murdered children. Oh, maybe not?

              edit: K, where did I ever come close to implying any civilian life (that’s universal jackass) is less worthy or valuable. What a fucking coward, coming in and editing the original as a way to skip a response. Here’s one in return piss pants.

            • @SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              You’re implying that Israel is entitled to murder thousands of civilians, half of them children, and level to the ground a city that used to house over half a million people up until recently, just because its far right government that has protected people who abused Palestinians for decades doesn’t want to seek any solution other than relentless violence. One day you’ll look at yourself in the mirror and find yourself a monster.

        • @quindraco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Better way is easy: a one state solution like Israel claims it wants would be better than this. Declare everyone in Palestine an Israeli citizen, move in law enforcement in force, and arrest murderers for murder.

          • V17
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            I agree that it would be better for the Palestinians, clearly Israeli Arabs have better lives than people in Gaza and West Bank despite also facing some discrimination, but Gazans would never agree to this (that is clear from public opinion polls done by PA institutions - for example over 70% of people in Gaza support violence against Israeli civilians), so the end result would be exactly the same is this one. You would still have an army of violent murderers hiding in tunnels with almost two decades of preparation for exactly this.

    • @cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      So, you believe Israel can identify a Hamas terrorist remotely to bomb them, but can’t identify Hamas terrorists when they are at the border in person?

      • V17
        link
        fedilink
        -22 years ago

        The people IDF is targeting are Hamas leaders or “officers”, who need to communicate a lot and sometimes even show in public, so they can be tracked with enough time. Boots on the ground soldiers are a completely different problem and Israel doesn’t even have the resources to track all of them because there are so many. How is that not obvious??

        • TinyPizzaOP
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          So 10,000 people have died now to kill how many? Here’s a question, what number is okay to kill? You seem to know these things so the answer should be obvious.

    • @mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      My dude has never seen a customs office or checkpoint in his life

      No its obviously because Israel doesn’t care about Palestinians lol. They wouldn’t have literally any of these issues if they hadn’t been doing like 80 years worth of state sponsored occupation and murder.

      You really think the people in Gaza chose to willingly leave their former homes and land to move into a military enclave?

      • V17
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        You are extremely naive if you think that a military checkpoint would solve this problem. Egypt was not able to stop Hamas terrorists and their supplies going back and forth through the Rafah border crossing to commit acts of terror in the Sinai peninsula for example. And that was during “business as usual”, not in a situation where potentially hundreds of thousands of people would likely have to go through.

        • @mlg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Bold of you to assume Egypt isn’t complicit in letting that happen lol.

          Their military literally runs on bribery. So much so that there’s a local conspiracy there that Egypt provided Israel with all the intel during the 6 day war because they had no intention of fighting and negotiated to get Gaza off their hands in exchange for never having to worry about Israel again.

          Again though, my point is that Hamas as an entity wouldn’t exist if Palestinians were considered regular citizens and not forced off from their own property.

          • V17
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Again though, my point is that Hamas as an entity wouldn’t exist if Palestinians were considered regular citizens and not forced off from their own property.

            This may be true and it would be good to consider this when deciding what to do after Hamas is gone, but it doesn’t change anything about current situation. The fact is that thinking a military checkpoint would filter out terrorists is incredibly naive, and whether Israel cares about the lives of civilians or not likely wouldn’t change this particular issue at all.

    • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Either they’re armed and easy to identify or they’re not at which point there’s one less person to worry about shooting Israeli soldiers while their tunnel network is dismantled. I don’t see the problem.

      • V17
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Do you honestly not see the problem with letting out at the very least tens of thousands of people, possibly hundreds of thousands, and guarding them all well enough so that none of them can do any hostilities that can be done without smuggling arms out of Gaza (whether it’s sabotage, inciting violent protests to keep the IDF occupied or terrorist acts using weapons smuggled into Israel from elsewhere)?

        • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          It’d be hard sure. Still better than bombing the spots they directed people to and killing droves of civilians.

      • @bookmeat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        No, now you have two more people inspired to shoot Israeli soldiers and civilians. It’s like you don’t even understand how people’s minds actually work.

    • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Why does Israel not let people leave and use its famed intelligence services to identify who the Hamas fighters are? It is looking like the Israeli government simply prefers collective punishment or even genocide.