• @HighElfMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Mansa Musa was just the king. It’s like saying that everyone in America is rich because Jeff Bezos is rich.

      Also, Mansa Musa’s wealth has been exaggerated a lot and the crashing economies while on pilgrimage thing is probably bunk.

            • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              I’m not even the same person. But more importantly, I’m not the one acting like asking for sources is a rebuttal when a) you haven’t brought any either, and b) this is an internet conversation, not an essay. If you really want to read up on what someone is saying, there are internet services that can be used to find more information to support or oppose what others say on the internet.

    • @Torvum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -82 years ago

      Mali only had an estimated 400 billion in treasury and it was a hereditary kingdom where only Mansa himself would have benefited directly. The United States treasury distributes 3 trillion across all federal agencies (some SUPPOSED to benefit citizens but y’know).

      As for Ubi, there needs to be incentive to tie it to at least having a job or being on qualified unemployment or education. Know too many 18 year olds that would start cashing that just to stay at home and do nothing useful.

      • @Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        Im honestly tired of this argument.

        Ive worked several jobs across my life time and if we paid people room and board to stay the fuck at home the world would be better for it.

        • @Torvum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -112 years ago

          Far from it but it’s your fantasy land, my dude. Antisocial freaks who don’t conceptualize the amount we need logistics and services can seethe on cope all day ig.

          • @Rakonat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Automation and AI (it’s not true AI but it’s displacing workers all the same) and handling more and more logistics as time goes and the tech gets cheaper and better, there are less jobs that an 18 year old would qualify for.

            Do you want someone doing that job that actually wants to work, or someone showing up and doing the bare minimum they can get away with to collect a check?

            And the jobs that do actually have need of peiple? Well now they can do their part to attract those with the skill and knowledge to do them rather than rely on a revovling door of people just showing up because someone told them they had to.

            • @Torvum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              You must never have worked in logistics. There are so many jobs that automation cannot do at this moment and won’t for a very long time.

              • @Rakonat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                I’m not sure what you’re talking about then because everything from truck drivers and trains to warehouse workers are being primed to be replaced by automated or AI networked machines. There are very few jobs in that sector not up to be replaced by a machine and most of those are things that require a masters degree in engineering or mathematics and statistics.

                Pretty much everything that would be considered an entry level job someone with a high school diploma or GED would have a chance of getting isn’t going to be around 10-15 years from now, and those that are will have a high level of competition that anyone not overqualified simply doesn’t qualify against anyone else needing a job. What jobs can’t be entirely automated or done by a machine are going to have more potential applicants than the company could ever hope to employ, let alone need to.

                So yeah, TL;DR if we started UBI now with no strings attached and let people without a desire to work, you’re not going to see a drop in productivity or services. The only places that might feel the hurt are the places that exploit that young adults without college degrees willing to work a job for 3-9 months before quitting and finding a new job.

      • @31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        It’s not “universal” if you start tying it to stuff. There are many cases where people cannot work (recessions, disabilities, need to care for family members, etc). The incentive to work would still naturally be there (to get more than “basic” income). Also, everyone wants a purpose, even if you may not see it as useful; it is a human need.

      • @LazyBane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        If people don’t have to worry with the stress of just surviving the month, they’ll want to do more with their life and get more. People will always want a bigger house, nicer car, faster PC, there’ll always be the motivation to find work, and when they have the freedom and ability to achive that, they’ll go do it. It’s one of the ways we can utilise our greedy nature in a positive way.

        What UBI will do is make it so the average person isn’t at the mercy of minium wage jobs that will go nowhere, just to not die on the street. An effective slave.