@Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • 2 years agoThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.message-square186fedilinkarrow-up1977arrow-down199
arrow-up1878arrow-down1message-squareThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.@Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square186fedilink
minus-square@DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.mllinkfedilink2•2 years agoThat is wildly inaccurate and you know it. There are like 6.5 million articles on Wikipedia and the majority (since people are pedantic, we’ll say 50.1%) are well cited and accurate
minus-square@zephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilink0•2 years agoHave you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia? The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.
That is wildly inaccurate and you know it. There are like 6.5 million articles on Wikipedia and the majority (since people are pedantic, we’ll say 50.1%) are well cited and accurate
Have you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia?
The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.