JackGreenEarth to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • 2 years agoInteresting how artists don't make enough money from their creations, so our solution is to make certain information illegal to share, rather than give them a universal basic income.message-square97fedilinkarrow-up1474arrow-down190
arrow-up1384arrow-down1message-squareInteresting how artists don't make enough money from their creations, so our solution is to make certain information illegal to share, rather than give them a universal basic income.JackGreenEarth to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-square@cdegallo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink9•2 years agoThe creation can possibly have monetary value, thus the protection. How much is up to society. This isn’t a good argument for UBI.
minus-square@nephs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•2 years agoUnfortunately, “society” doesn’t control most of the value of anything. The monopolists do. So the only really valuable kind of art is the art that can be used for speculation and money laundering.
The creation can possibly have monetary value, thus the protection. How much is up to society.
This isn’t a good argument for UBI.
Unfortunately, “society” doesn’t control most of the value of anything. The monopolists do.
So the only really valuable kind of art is the art that can be used for speculation and money laundering.