• @SARGEx117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    At least the city I lived in was close enough to “primary nuclear strike” targets to be demolished by shockwave.

    Never mind the fact that that’s nuclear strike targets, not “Terrorist-hijacked-jets” target. Clearly people tend not to think rationally about these things.

    • @Cheesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Are you between the two nuclear labs in the Bay area? Those always show up as top targets and people always brought it up

      • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        The Midwest is full of missile silos that are on MAD target lists. There’s possibly more legitimate fear that terrorists could target something in San Francisco or similarly popular places. Terrorists also want attention, so a place with lots of news coverage is better too.

    • @MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Well, I HOPE most people think rationally, but the ones who are going to whine about the local sports match? … Yeah, agreed.

    • @SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      My dad pointed out to me as a kid that the city next to us would be a nuke target because it held the US strategic reserve of silicon carbide, a substance critical to grinding parts (e.g. making weapons).