We do not need our bodies once we leave this world regardless of what you think happens after we die. We should be focused on curing diseases and extending the life of living humans. Science would go so far if we used human bodies after death instead of requiring people to give consent to something they don’t need.

  • @brendansimms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 hours ago

    There was a scandal in the US where bodies being donated to ‘science’ were used for munitions testing by the us military. So the “who receives said body” is very important.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 hours ago

      Yeah but there you’re talking about the US where no one gives a fuck about anything but money.

      I fully agree that after tmdeath all bodies should be used automatically for either organ donation or science. I’m dead already, let my (un)timely demise be the reason why someone else can be helped

      • @Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        Their point is you cannot just use a blanket term such as “for science” and expect everyone else to know what is and isn’t considered appropriate. As they said, those bodies were still used “for science”… military science and weapons testing. It is still technically “for science”.

        The discussion shouldn’t be on what we personally find appropriate, instead we must first determine who has authority over the cadaver. It is no longer a person with autonomy, just a bag of flesh and bone, an inanimate object. Who owns it? The next of kin? The state? Some other third entity?

        Once this question is answered, it will be up to them what ultimately happens to the cadaver.