A “paragon of virtue” is a person who is considered a perfect example of goodness and moral excellence. It implies they possess a high degree of admirable qualities like honesty, kindness, and justice, making them a role model of good character. The phrase is often used to describe someone who is perceived as flawless or exceptionally virtuous.
I never used this term sorry, I’m not sure what you’re reading.
She has children an online business so she has to be a paragon of virtue have basic OPSEC?
Yes, everyone should practice OPSEC, but a public “celebrity” who’s sole business is online doubly so.
Operations security (OPSEC) is a process that identifies critical information to determine whether friendly actions can be observed by enemy intelligence, determines if information obtained by adversaries could be interpreted to be useful to them, and then executes selected measures that eliminate or reduce adversary exploitation of friendly critical information.
A parent should simply include their kids in the calculus.
Yes, everyone should practice OPSEC, but a public “celebrity” who’s sole business is online doubly so.
She doesn’t practice OPSEC because she has an OF that exists? I am not nearly as aware of her OF as the people that don’t like her, so you’ll have to let me know if there’s something different she should be doing with it.
to determine whether friendly actions can be observed by enemy intelligence
I must be really out of the loop. What is her business that results in her having enemy intelligence? Is it being on OF that gets you enemy intelligence, or making comics?
I’ll quote the enemy intelligence part from an r/outoftheloop thread. You can read the whole thing if you’re interested about the events of her most recent hack/doxxing about a week ago.
Her account got hacked by users from soyjack party, an imageboard like 4chan. She has said that the hackers deleted her account. They found her password and email and caused chaos, including leaking private reddit messages and are likely testing other accounts as well.
I don’t know what this current flavor of doxxing is, because her name has been known for some time. However, In January her home address became semi-public information based on her “Pizzacake Comics Inc.” business licence in Canada. This was recently discovered, along with her current login details.
I really hate how much talking about internet security comes across as victim blaming but not having 2FA set up as a public celebrity who is constantly being attacked is once again bad OPSEC.
not having 2FA set up as a public celebrity who is constantly being attacked is once again bad OPSEC.
Sure. But that sounds like her problem, not a reason for me to dislike her.
This sounds a lot like “there are duchbags attacking her because they are misogynists” which again, is not a good reason for other people to dislike her.
You don’t seem to realize she is the victim of horrific hate campaigns, having her personal information including address and kids school doxxed, her account through which she makes her income hacked and deleted, she’s been stalked, threatened and harassed, etc.
I’m over here trying to talk about internet security.
If you’re just looking for reasons to dislike her then go circlejerk somewhere else
If you’re just looking for reasons to dislike her then go circlejerk somewhere else
I’m not, but if we look back to the top of this comment chain, we see someone complaining that the comments won’t be about the comic but instead about how shitty a person the artist is for some reason.
We get a reply to that about how she has an OF, and then the comment you replied to:
I fail to understand why posting a pair of tits is such a controversial thing to do. Maybe I’m too European to lose my marbles over some nipples.
So one could be forgiven for assuming your response to that was part of the conversation about why it’s so controversial and the artist being a shitty person.
If you are in fact over here just “trying to talk about Internet security” then it sounds like you’ve taken a bizarre tangent from the topic at hand in order to circle jerk about your topic of choice.
We get a reply to that about how she has an OF, and then the comment you replied to:
I fail to understand why posting a pair of tits is such a controversial thing to do. Maybe I’m too European to lose my marbles over some nipples.
Yes, in my original comment I was explaining why her posting a pair of tits was “controversial” to her audience.
Then you started asking me a bunch of questions about her OPSEC.
So one could be forgiven for assuming your response to that was part of the conversation about why it’s so controversial **and the artist being a shitty person. **.
I have spent multiple comments stating no that’s not what I’m saying and correcting you.
It can not be forgiven at this point if you still insist on your misunderstanding so I’m going to disengage.
I must be really out of the loop.
This was the actual problem remember. You didn’t know she had attacks from hackers, you didn’t know about her business or any of the story.
You’re welcome for looping you in but dear God why have you reset back 10 comments already and acting like you forgot what we literally just went over.
What?
I never used this term sorry, I’m not sure what you’re reading.
Yes, everyone should practice OPSEC, but a public “celebrity” who’s sole business is online doubly so.
A parent should simply include their kids in the calculus.
She doesn’t practice OPSEC because she has an OF that exists? I am not nearly as aware of her OF as the people that don’t like her, so you’ll have to let me know if there’s something different she should be doing with it.
I must be really out of the loop. What is her business that results in her having enemy intelligence? Is it being on OF that gets you enemy intelligence, or making comics?
If she didn’t want her nudes to be publicly accessibly, uploading them publicly on social media could be considered bad OPSEC.
Oh, I guess you are, sorry. Like I was saying in my last comment, there’s a lot of “lore”.
Her primary business is through her comics. She actually turned making a business into a comic itself.
https://www.reddit.com/user/Pizzacakecomic/comments/1jaby6v/comment/mqri41h/?context=3
I’ll quote the enemy intelligence part from an r/outoftheloop thread. You can read the whole thing if you’re interested about the events of her most recent hack/doxxing about a week ago.
https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/1kio389/whats_going_on_with_pizza_cake/
From a recent comment, she has only now set up 2FA.
https://www.reddit.com/user/Pizzacakecomic/comments/1kipftd/comment/mrgpabo/
I really hate how much talking about internet security comes across as victim blaming but not having 2FA set up as a public celebrity who is constantly being attacked is once again bad OPSEC.
Sure. But that sounds like her problem, not a reason for me to dislike her.
This sounds a lot like “there are duchbags attacking her because they are misogynists” which again, is not a good reason for other people to dislike her.
You don’t seem to realize she is the victim of horrific hate campaigns, having her personal information including address and kids school doxxed, her account through which she makes her income hacked and deleted, she’s been stalked, threatened and harassed, etc.
I’m over here trying to talk about internet security.
If you’re just looking for reasons to dislike her then go circlejerk somewhere else
I’m not, but if we look back to the top of this comment chain, we see someone complaining that the comments won’t be about the comic but instead about how shitty a person the artist is for some reason.
We get a reply to that about how she has an OF, and then the comment you replied to:
So one could be forgiven for assuming your response to that was part of the conversation about why it’s so controversial and the artist being a shitty person.
If you are in fact over here just “trying to talk about Internet security” then it sounds like you’ve taken a bizarre tangent from the topic at hand in order to circle jerk about your topic of choice.
deleted by creator
Yes, in my original comment I was explaining why her posting a pair of tits was “controversial” to her audience.
Then you started asking me a bunch of questions about her OPSEC.
I have spent multiple comments stating no that’s not what I’m saying and correcting you.
It can not be forgiven at this point if you still insist on your misunderstanding so I’m going to disengage.
This was the actual problem remember. You didn’t know she had attacks from hackers, you didn’t know about her business or any of the story.
You’re welcome for looping you in but dear God why have you reset back 10 comments already and acting like you forgot what we literally just went over.
Good luck with whatever the hell you’re doing.