No evidence has been seen that a genocide is occurring in Gaza or that women and children were targeted by the IDF, UK government lawyers have claimed, as a high court case opened into the handling of arms exports controls to Israel.
They also suggested there was no obligation placed on the UK to make other states comply with international humanitarian law but only to ensure that no breach occured within its jurisdiction.
The government is seeking to defend itself in a judicial review brought over allegations that it acted unlawfully in continuing to sell F-35 parts and components to a global pool, even though some of those components might be used by Israel in Gaza in a way that the government regards as a breach of international law.
Much of the case will turn on the extent to which international law places obligations in domestic law.
Israel is a valuable strategic staging point for The West in the The Middle East. No Western Power will jeopardize access to it.
That’s why Israel’s behavior is tolerated, and Israel knows it.
And no, I’m not an Anti-Semite. Not all Jews are Israelis.
deleted by creator
Yup Israel has always had a free pass cause they’re basically the only ally of west in broken and dangerous middle east.
Thats why Saudi Arabia is so fascinating - if they drag middle east out of swamp of incompetence they could make Israel redundant and take away its free pass.
Is that supposed to be some kind of joke?
Saudi Arabia is the MOST incompetent of the whole bunch!
It just doesn’t matter because they literally have more money than God.
They’re so ultra-inbred incompetent that they literally founded, funded and armed a terrorist group that made their first and foremost goal the fall of Saudi Arabia under an Islamic caliphate.
They learned to stay out of wars decades ago, because they’re too mentally damaged to fight them.
I mean, until they tried to genocide Yemen, and of course got their asses handed to them by unarmed goat-herders who are still infinitely less trash.
The Saudis fought in the first Gulf War (though not in the second one). There were Iraqi incursions in northeast KSA near the Kuwaiti border, and Scud missile attacks on Dhahran/Al-Khobar. I am acquainted with a US general who commanded a tank battalion in that war. He said one of their orders was to shoot the Saudi tanks if they tried to run and hide. He said they had to do that twice before the rest got the message.
With the exception of some of the Bedouins, Saudis are soft. Yemenis are mean, qat-chewing sons of bitches who’ve been through a long civil war and who all seem to own AK47s. MBS’s genocide is accomplished entirely by aerial bombardment of largely civilian populations. Fighting house-to-house in Yemen would incur too many casualties, even if the Saudi armed forces were at the top of their game, which they most decidedly are not.
You seem wildly confused what competence we’re talking about here. Saudi Arabia by far is the most competent Middle East country when it comes to building relationships with the west, no?
No.
They also funded the 9/11 terrorists. Fuck that apologetic bullshit.
Not sure what that has to do with anything I said but sure
Well, you were kissing their asses like they were the Saviors of The Middle East.
They’re not.
That’s not what I said, maybe take a nap or something? You seem groggy
Remember that part?
I’m not interested in conversing with you ever again. Goodbye.
You have very bad reading comprehension. The person you are quoting never praised Saudi Arabia and never said they were the saviors of anything.
Reading comprehension and mental healthcare of a true American lmao
Take care
It’s not unusual to see bootlickers on Lemmy, but sandal-lickers are relatively rare. How do you enjoy the taste of shib-shib?