Teens have access to vastly more potent cannabis than their parents had at their age. Parents need to understand the risks, including psychosis

12ft.io link

  • @voltaric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49 days ago

    Wow they fail basic science. Correlation does not equal causation. More gateway drug scare in its modern form.

    • x-Cell
      link
      fedilink
      English
      179 days ago

      No, they don’t “fail basic science”. They point out that there is a correlation and we need better studies, but the mere existence of the correlation is worrying, especially considering a lot of recent studies are confirming the link between cannabis and teen psychosis. A lot of the early studies on the harm of cigarettes started similarly. Correlation between lung cancer and smoking tobacco doesn’t imply causation, but it’s one hell of an alarm bell.

      The author of the article themselves doesn’t say cannabis is a gateway drug and even recognizes that asking people to just not use it isn’t realistic.

      • @voltaric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        They fail to explore systemic correlations and hyperfocus on cannabis. I am claiming they are repeating reactionary history instead of systemic analysis. Focusing on what is wrong with the individual rather than the system that bore them.

        The article is an opinion as stated at the bottom.

        • x-Cell
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -19 days ago

          Hell yeah. Correlation studies are useless guys! I know very much science.

        • x-Cell
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 days ago

          Hey thank you! I thought Lemmy could never have the full Reddit experience, but there’s completely lazy and misinformed comments here too.

          Try reading the article next time.

    • @futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 days ago

      Correlation does not equal causation.

      And cutting and pasting isn’t a reasoned argument, either.

      Without correlation, there is no causation. So correlation can be taken to be an an indication that causation is not ruled out.

    • @Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      You’re gonna get tired of repeating this in about, oh, 20 years.

      I’m speaking from experience.

      You’re entirely correct, just to be clear. You’re just gonna get tired of repeating it.