• yeehaw
    link
    fedilink
    271 month ago

    All this would be solved if the left leaders would actually fix affordability. This is the only real reason I see so many voting right. Nobody can afford shit and they blame the left.

    • @Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 month ago

      Problem is it’s not the left’s fault. The world is blaming the leaders but it’s happening globally. The real problem is a few have all the wealth.

      • @sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 month ago

        Our left leaning leaders should update tax laws to address the growing wealth gap. And start building homes so average Canadians can afford a decent home in a decent location.

      • @jimd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 month ago

        Capitalism, infinite greed and growth and the resulting wealth inequality. Unaffordablity is the inevitable conclusion of late stage capitalism

        • @eurisko@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          This right here. This principle is baked into its very core. We know exactly what to do to counter that. It’s not rocket science: We need to do away with tricklenomics, and speculative economy and start taxing the ultrarich, and imposing limits to their reach.

    • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      if the left leaders would actually fix affordability

      I’m sorry; it’s the sole responsibility of the left? Is their “we’ll raise the tide a little and float all the boats” not as glamorous as the right’s “first we’ll cut taxes, bankrupt medical and transit, and then let someone else take it from there” plan?

    • @sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      That’s the key here - the Liberals under Trudeau waited too long to move on affordability, and then they didn’t do enough. I hope Carney & co can show quick improvements in housing so the CPC is less attractive.

    • @saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      The Crown corp and modular homes seems like a pretty great way of adding a lot of affordable homes. I just hope the government lasts long enough for it to actually kick off. It’s not perfect and it doesn’t solve capitalism, but it will help if executed well.

      If I were to bet, I’d say we’ll see the effects just in time for an election, and cpc will take over and take the credit.

      • @toastmeister@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The cost of homes is mostly land value, which is like 80%-90% in large cities. Because of sprawled zoning, bureaucracy, and greenbelt. Second biggest cost is taxes.

        • @saigot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Houses are expensive even in bumfuck no where and the point of modular buildings and wartime measures is that it drops a large amount of the bureaucracy without compromising on quality like deregulating would.

          I agree zoning and sprawl are problems though, there isn’t as much the feds can do about it as it’s more a provincial and municipal concern. The planned high speed rail (a Trudeau thing not a carney thing tbf) along the toronto-montreal corridor should help somewhat reduce the sprawl. As someone who lives an hour east of Toronto, I do wish it was planned to extend to me.