Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

  • @ShittDickk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    108 days ago

    A universal right to self. Get the trans / gay community, the raw milkers, the anti vaccers, the druggies and the prochoice crowd all on the same page.

    The government should make no law demanding or preventing the alteration of any and all, organs protrusions or growths of organic matter attached to and constituting the body of a sentient person not under the court directed care of another.

    • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      188 days ago

      With antivaxx though - I think that’s a “your rights end where mine begin” kind of issue. Some moron shitting themselves to death because they think milk tastes better without the poop germs boiled out can take themselves out, but I have a sibling who can’t get certain vaccines/some vaccines are less effective. I think he has the right to not be exposed to easily preventable diseases.

      • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 days ago

        You could cover this pretty accurately by making being in public without vaccinations count as reckless endangerment. In theory, an antivaxx person in isolation is not the issue. The issue is them exposing other people.

        • @andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          48 days ago

          Exactomundo. Philosophically fine, if you can find a way to make your choice not impact others.

          Another big problem is they don’t tend to vaccinate their kids either. IMHO, kids deserve a higher standard of care/protection than “whatever their birth giver thinks is appropriate.” (Medical neglect fucking sucks - try pulling off your braces with pliers lol)

          • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Good point! The amount of crackpot “here’s how we can fix society” ideas I’ve come up with that are completely ruined by the existence of children is honestly crazy. I know “protect the kids!!” has been co-opted for some rather unsavory agendas, but it really is important, moreso even than we often consider.

      • @ShittDickk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        17 days ago

        At that point the disease is not composed of your own body and DNA and shedding it would be made illegal to do in public.

    • @Two2Tango@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      18 days ago

      If they’re all on the same page, how do you feel about excluding any single component of this group from private property? Is it ok for businesses to exclude the unvaccinated? How about the others? If not, is that infringing on the business owner’s right to self?

      I think a lot of people would say it’s ok to do that to some and not others, which means these groups can’t be on the same page.

      • @ShittDickk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        27 days ago

        This is to prevent the government from making laws, i believe people should be allowed to choose who they interact with and serve provided their business is not funded by any taxpayer funds (ie subsidies, grants, etc.

        No no healthcare or schooling discrimination, sorry if u cant eat at jims ruff n tuff diner.