FenrirIII to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agoMuricalemmy.mlimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1428arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: greentext@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1416arrow-down1imageMuricalemmy.mlFenrirIII to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square69fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: greentext@sh.itjust.works
minus-square@Ledivin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-23 months agoFood -> exerting force is not even remotely fuel efficient
minus-square@grue@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoIIRC, even considering those losses, biking is still one of the most efficient forms of land transport. What I found interesting was a study that found that e-bikes were even more efficient than regular ones.
minus-square@Naz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoIt’s about 22-24% efficient which is the same as a carbon engine. Chemistry and physics, yo, stochiometric ratios. No free lunch. The difference is the mass component of F = M•A
Food -> exerting force is not even remotely fuel efficient
IIRC, even considering those losses, biking is still one of the most efficient forms of land transport. What I found interesting was a study that found that e-bikes were even more efficient than regular ones.
It’s about 22-24% efficient which is the same as a carbon engine.
Chemistry and physics, yo, stochiometric ratios. No free lunch.
The difference is the mass component of F = M•A