I know nothing should surprise me with these fucking people at this point, but my mouth still dropped open when I read that.

  • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    Hence why I said you had blood on your hands no matter what. This is where harm mitigation comes in, by not voting, you agree to whoever is elected, in this case trump who wants to further ethnic cleansing. This was the last election in the US as we know it. And trump isn’t a “tiny bit worse”.

    • @thesven@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Who said anything about not voting? There were not just two candidates last time I checked.

      I agree to whoever gets elected, because that is how democracy works. As far as I am concerned that might be the last election in the US. period. And the Democratic Party is partly to blame.

      • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not voting for the only viable candidate that wasn’t an overt fascist is empowering fascists. The democrats aren’t solely to blame those who allowed a fascist dictator to come into power share the blame

        • @Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not voting for candidate = voting for them.

          Solid logic.

          Telling people how they have to vote.

          Also, solid logic.

          • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Thank you, yes when it comes to a fascist dictator vs a non fascist, non dictator, voting for the non fascist non dictator is the only viable option, unless you’re OK with a fascist dictator.

            Pretty fucking clear.

        • @thesven@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -23 months ago

          “Not voting for the only viable candidate”. So between two shit candidates, we should vote for the one who smells the least like shit. Nope. That’s not how democracy works. Everyone should vote for the candidate that bests represents them. I didn’t say that democrats are solely to blame. I said partly.

          • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 months ago

            When it’s fptp yes that’s the litteral outcome. Everyone SHOULD vote for the best candidate that represents them, in FPTP that’s not how it works. When only one of 2 parties could get elected in the US and one of them is a fascist dictator, and the other isn’t that is how it must work. When fptp is removed, and you could get a real democracy then yes. Until then the only moral option is to mitigate harm

            • @thesven@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              And that literally doesn’t solve anything. It just postpones the inevitable. Democracy lost the moment DNC plotted against Bernie Sanders back in 2016. What would you think would happen if we had another 4 years of Democrats? Fascism would just come 4 years later.

              • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                33 months ago

                It would give 4 years to work towards electing more progressive people at a municipal and state level. It literally give a chance to solve something instead of being accelerationist.

                  • @T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    33 months ago

                    It genuinely did, for many Americans, trans rights, federal funding for science. Should it have been better? Yes. Because it wasn’t perfect does that mean fascism should be allowed in? No.