Yes, but im already using the computer for other things and it would be more inefficient to double up on heating sources. I can confirm from personal expirence a PC in a small room can sufficently act as climate control.
This is true, but it’s shocking how few people have heat pumps, especially in colder climates.
Still, it’s also far less efficient than using a gas furnace (to the point that most people would actually burn more fossil fuels per Joule of heat from a resistive heater than from just burning the gas directly in a furnace).
Of course, if you’re doing something useful with that energy, using the waste heat is an extra benefit. Like using waste heat from a power plant for district heating.
“Incredibly inefficient” is a bit of an exaggeration, heat pumps typically run at an efficiency of about 2, occasionally 3. It’s better but not by orders of magnitude. Not gonna make much of a difference at 500 watts.
Not sure who’s down voting you. You’re right. There’s Heat pumps that can move 5x more heat than the energy they use. While a PC only gives you max 1:1
I interpreted the sentiment from OP that it was just reframing the reality in either case: the server is going to run, and it’s going to generate heat.
You can either frame that reality as “waste heat is being generated” or “my furnace doesn’t have to work as hard”
Electricity generated heat from your servers is incredibly inefficient compared to a heat pump.
Yes, but im already using the computer for other things and it would be more inefficient to double up on heating sources. I can confirm from personal expirence a PC in a small room can sufficently act as climate control.
Conversely it’s exactly as efficient as a resistive heater, which lots of people still use.
Thank you, this thought had occurred to me recently, and I was wondering if it was accurate.
This is true, but it’s shocking how few people have heat pumps, especially in colder climates.
Still, it’s also far less efficient than using a gas furnace (to the point that most people would actually burn more fossil fuels per Joule of heat from a resistive heater than from just burning the gas directly in a furnace).
Of course, if you’re doing something useful with that energy, using the waste heat is an extra benefit. Like using waste heat from a power plant for district heating.
“Incredibly inefficient” is a bit of an exaggeration, heat pumps typically run at an efficiency of about 2, occasionally 3. It’s better but not by orders of magnitude. Not gonna make much of a difference at 500 watts.
Not sure who’s down voting you. You’re right. There’s Heat pumps that can move 5x more heat than the energy they use. While a PC only gives you max 1:1
I interpreted the sentiment from OP that it was just reframing the reality in either case: the server is going to run, and it’s going to generate heat.
You can either frame that reality as “waste heat is being generated” or “my furnace doesn’t have to work as hard”