• MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Right because everyone needing a car means everyone who can’t afford one just automatically gets one.

      Step one of reducing car-dependency is to reduce their number on the road. Then you can start bulding shit that accommodates the poor through actually nice-to-use public transit, bicycle paths, and walking routes.

      Charge the rich. Build for the poor. Better yet, charge the rich, build for everyone. Not just cars. Because not everyone has cars.

      Like FFS “good job now the poor can’t drive” is hardly a comeback when it’s like the most expensive mode of transit, massively subsidized with taxpayer money, just to kind of make it work. It wasn’t something that could be made affordable or even efficient enough for everyone to use on a daily basis to begin with.

    • edric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      424 months ago

      What was that saying again, something along the lines of: A great city is not where the poor own and drive cars, but the rich take public transportation.

      • @regul@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars. It’s where the rich use public transportation.

        - Gustavo Petro, current president of Colombia, former mayor of Bogota

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 months ago

      Now cars are only for the rich

      More that roads are for high occupancy or professional vehicles - buses, ambulances, construction vehicles, commercial trucks - that still need access to Manhattan but can’t be placed on a train.