• @Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How is a list of seven(!) different analyzed potential factors reduced by you with a “wtf” to one of those?

    And then followed by an anecdote, a correlated studies off topic to the study described and a bit of conspiracy theory (note: one of the few I even support myself, but i’s out of scope of this article!).

    You’re actively harming the points you want to make by jumping onto the wrong targets.

    • @Squiddick17@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -25 months ago

      No one gives a fuck about “the points”, when are you people going to figure that out? You are the ones harming people by trying to dismiss necessary behavioral changes and real advice because there are technically other factors that you can back up with OODLES OF PEER-REVIEWED STUDIES, HOW CAN YOU INSULT MY INTELLIGENCE LIKE THIS??? No one cares what you studied while knocking out gen ed requirements, get over yourself.

      You’re not in high school debate class anymore, you’re among people seeking and sharing knowledge that can be of actual use to them. If you’re gonna pretend you’re in someone’s corner and shield them from a false sense of blame, and then REFUSE to discuss actual, meaningful solutions, you are utterly worthless in spaces like this.