• @cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Public transport do run on the roads, too. It’s not “private car only”.

    • @6mementomori@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      never said it’s private car only, but i did use wrong wording, sorry. what i meant was, those are the same roads public transport runs on, so the “cars can go anywhere” point kinda falls unless we’re talking offroading. mildly inconveniencing, but that’s just a tradeoff, it’s the entire point of fuckcars

      • @Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        The problem with public transport is that it only goes on pre-planned routes. If you want to go elsewhere, you can’t without a car. And replacing all nature with rails and asphalt is a very bad idea.

        • @6mementomori@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          you don’t need to replace anything, the roads are already there. and if you wanna go somewhere super specific, just walk, keep in mind that if transport is more invested into, it will barely be different from car travel. the mild convenience created by cars isn’t worth the clutter that 10 times the volume of automobiles will create. also parking is already a problem now.

          • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12 years ago

            The problem isn’t the roads, but needing to create a route that touches every single road. Public transportation can’t really do customization, it’s a one size fits all deal.