• @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    449 months ago

    THIS is the one that makes me the angriest.

    I’m happy to comply with your complexity requirements, but don’t tell me about each one only when I’ve failed to meet it. That’s really past the bar of shitty design into the realm of asshole design.

    • SSTF
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      I’m not a security expert, so I’m sure someone can correct me, but it is my understanding that all the nonsense of adding numbers and special characters does nothing to increase security. Longer passwords increase security, even if they are all lowercase letters.

      So, “PaS$w3rD@” is a much less secure password than “sallyandbillywenttothestoreforsoda”

      • @thenextguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        That’s 59 and 159 bits of entropy, respectively according to some random online password entropy calculator I found.

        Even better, just type out the whole sentence fully. Why disallow spaces?

        “Sally and Billy went to the store for soda”. 274 bits.

      • @thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        It’s not that it does NOTHING to improve security… An 8-character password with more options per character IS more complex (and in that sense, secure) than one with fewer.

        It’s just that adding more characters (e.g. in a passphrase, as per your example) also increases complexity, and is more usable.

    • @thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      And it’s so weird that almost everyone seems to do it that way. I can’t think of a reason other than complacency of a non-golden path interaction.