• @Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    First, the bump to 66% only happens after 250k that year so $25k would not trigger the extra 16% eligibility. So standard 50% CG only would be applied. $12.5k taxed at your rate means the min rate which may be something like 20% (this number is a wild guess) so say $2500 paid to the gov. Not as bad as it sounds.

    • @ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Don’t forget that the $25k wouldn’t all be gains in the first place. If the investment had increased in value by 25%, it would be 20k base and only 5k gains; if it had increased by 100% it would be an even split. We’re talking about taxing a part of a part of the sale value.

      • @MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Once you get this far down the thread you realize how complicated it actually is and why most people have no sweet clue how it works.

    • @Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Thanks for the info, that makes perfect sense. Seems like a good idea to tax people making tons and tons of money at a high rate then!

      • @Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        IF it was forced to be in the 66% CG bracket $16.5k would be taxed at the previously posited 20% resulting in $3300 paid to government so it is a respectable jump in tax owed for those being subjected to it.