• hannes3120
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    And still some see the US constitution as this pinnacle of democracy when it’s vastly outdated by now

    Even the founding fathers anticipated a lot of reforms and for the whole thing to become obsolete quite soon but yet here we are with people worshipping them as this infallible being and weighting their words on a scale as if it’s impossible for them to be wrong

    • Eh, the founders more or less ensured that a wealthy land-owning aristocracy would be able to overrule the will of the people if need be. That’s more or less what the SCOTUS is there for, to ensure things don’t get too democratic.

      The US was an early modern democracy, but has never been a particularly good one.

    • @SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      It’s a shame they made it so hard to modify. Both the 2/3 of both houses or 3/4 of states routes are quite unfeasable when there are only two quite polarised parties… :-/

    • rockerface 🇺🇦
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      The whole 2 parties thing isn’t even in the constitution tho, is it? I’m not American so I might not be as familiar with the details

      • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The voting system makes it so the system will always tend toward two parties. Parties aren’t in the constitution at all. That’s where you get occasional independent candidates

      • @VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        It’s not. We’ve had third parties before, and we do still occasionally have independents take seats in congress(we have 3 currently)

        They’ll never be even close to majority though, and they will never take the presidency.