• gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ok, but $40 for 7 hours? You can get a 1-hour flight for $129

    We really need more high-speed rail

    • @SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      That’s a 1-hour flight, plus an hour to get to ORD, plus getting there the recommended 2 hours before the flight time to clear security and board, plus baggage claim at MSP. Flying is still faster, but the train is far more chill. High-speed rail would completely beat a plane.

      But also, the train makes intermediate stops. I’ve seen a number of Chicago people on social media excited about taking the Borealis to Wisconsin Dells, and that travel time is pretty comparable.

      • gregorum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        You’re not wrong. Plus, the trip on the train is certainly quite scenic.

    • dumples
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Don’t mind the price but the time is long. It will be slightly faster than driving but most of that time is gained going from the Chicago burbs to the city center. Depends on where in Chicago you are going

    • ares35
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      i remember talk as far back as the 1980s about high-speed rail between the cities and chicago.

      still waiting.

      • @Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        You’ve gotta be on the very edge of both suburbs to be doing it in that time. Minneapolis to Chicago is generally like 5 30