• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    “They have to kill the children because there are terrorists next to them” is really not a moral defense for killing children. If anything, it makes it seem like the terrorists have a point.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        “The terrorism came first” is also not a moral defense for killing children, sorry. I get that you really like the idea of killing people, but that doesn’t make it morally defensible.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Ah, so now Hamas is letting children die from Israeli bombs and bullets.

            Boy do you do some pretzels trying to avoid connecting the victim with the killer.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They have always been content with letting children die, and with killing children. No pretzels. I have a consistent model. Happy to try and explain any distinction for you.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                You are also content with letting children die. You already said it was justified because they were indoctrinated.

                So I guess you’re as bad as they are. Congratulations.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    I never said anything about myself. Why are you making this about me?

                    You have repeatedly justified the killing of children. Suddenly calling them innocent victims doesn’t take back the fact that you think it’s acceptable for IDF troops to put a bullet in their brain. It just means that you’re okay with killing innocent victims.