• @DrCake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Also it would take too long to build the nuclear plants. I’m all for building them but they’ll take like 10+ years. In the meantime we need to use solar/wind + batteries.

    • NielsBohron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We could have avoided burning a ton of fossil fuels if nuclear hadn’t been demonized in the 60’s, but as it stands, that ship has sailed. Let’s skip that stage on the tech tree and move to fully renewable!

      Edit: I guess I should say that I think nuclear will and should continue to be a pivotal part of any smart grid for a long time, since it fills a niche that “true” renewables can’t yet. I just don’t think pushing to build them now is ideal, as it’s more pressing to decommission all fossil fuels plants ASAP by any means necessary (which might mean using only the existing nuclear plants while we ramp up production of other green energy sources)

    • @Addition1291@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I agree. With the cost reduction on renewables, grid-scale nuclear doesn’t make a lot of sense anymore.

      However, I hope that nuclear will get a revival with SMR technology. Especially as local power facilities for things like data centers and auto plants and other industrial facilities that require as much power as a small nation.