A top Hamas political official told The Associated Press the Islamic militant group is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders.

  • @IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2124 days ago

    It’s important to note that for most of its existence, “fighting against Israeli oppression” explicitly meant Israel no longer existing. This is the first time I can remember them even implying that they would accept a two state solution.

    • @jpreston2005@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2424 days ago

      they accepted a two-state solution previously, the isreali PM that was negotiating with them at the time was assassinated.

      • gimpchrist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2724 days ago

        Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated by an Israeli law student who didn’t believe in the peace talks. Hamas didn’t even kill him, Israel did it. No fucking surprise there.

        • DdCno1
          link
          fedilink
          524 days ago

          Hamas was also not in power back then, in no position to accept or reject any solution.

      • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        523 days ago

        they accepted a two-state solution previously, the isreali PM that was negotiating with them at the time was assassinated.

        That was Fatah, not Hamas. Hamas was irrelevant back in the 90s and didn’t rise to prominence until the mid-2000s.

    • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1424 days ago

      Before 1948, Palestinian Leadership repeatedly advocated for a Unitary Binational State for decades: Palestinian Arab Congress advocating for Unified State 1928, Arab Higher Committee advocating for Unified State 1937, Arab League advocating for Unified State 1948

      After the founding of Israel, the Two-State Solutions were utilized to further annex the Palestinian Occupied Territories and enact military control over Palestinians while denying them human and civil rights. This is apartheid. Despite this, both Fatah and Hamas have accepted a Two-State Solution on the 1967 borders, with the two most important factors being the Right of Return of Palestinian refugees and an end to the permanent occupation.

      Oslo Accord Sources: MEE, NYT, Haaretz, AJ

      History of peace process - The Intercept

      The settlements represent land-grabbing, and land-grabbing and peace-making don’t go together, it is one or the other. By its actions, if not always in its rhetoric, Israel has opted for land-grabbing and as we speak Israel is expanding settlements. So, Israel has been systematically destroying the basis for a viable Palestinian state and this is the declared objective of the Likud and Netanyahu who used to pretend to accept a two-state solution. In the lead up to the last election, he said there will be no Palestinian state on his watch. The expansion of settlements and the wall mean that there cannot be a viable Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. The most that the Palestinians can hope for is Bantustans, a series of enclaves surrounded by Israeli settlements and Israeli military bases.

      • Avi Shlaim

      How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution

      ‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe

      One State Solution, Foreign Affairs

      • @nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        024 days ago

        They wanted a unified Arab state, and they wanted the non-Arab immigrants out

        And failing that, they tried to put a genocide on them

        Small details, I know

        • @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          223 days ago

          They wanted a unified Arab state, and they wanted the non-Arab immigrants out

          It’s true they wanted it to be an Arab state, since the vast majority were Arab. It’s not that they wanted ‘non-arab immigrants’ out, it’s that Zionist Settler Colonialism was quite different from normal immigration. Instead of integration, the early land purchases led to the expulsion of tens of thousands of Palestinians in the early 1900’s. Many Palestinians opposed the Zionist Land Purchases and Immigration because of fears they would be forced out of their homes and communities, not because they were Jewish.

          The Concept of Transfer 1882-1948

          Transfer Committee and the JNF led to Forced Displacement of 100,000 Palestinians throughout the mandate.

          And failing that, they tried to put a genocide on them

          Are you talking about the Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians? Because that was planned and carried out. There was nothing remotely equivalent from Palestinians or the Arab Liberation Army.

          • @nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            021 days ago

            It’s true they wanted it to be an Arab state, since the vast majority were Arab

            If you have sympathy for that argument, what’s the difference with jewish people who want the same? Both wanted to be the first class citizens in their country.

            the early land purchases led to the expulsion of tens of thousands of Palestinians in the early 1900’s

            That’s true, but it’s not different from renters who are forced out after their landlord sells the property. It’s not a ‘nice’ part of humanity, but it’s generally accepted as ‘fair’. Of course it’s true that most zionist immigrants had no plans to integrate with non-jews. Partly because of their own religious backwardness, partly because they moved there specifically to escape religious oppression.

            There was nothing remotely equivalent from Palestinians or the Arab Liberation Army

            There certainly was: Nebi Musa riots; 1929 Palestine Riots; etc. certainly showed the intent of many Palestinian Arabs to put an ethnic cleansing on the jews.

            You’re quite wrong if you don’t think the ALA or others didn’t go in with the same intent. You should look up their logo or statements from their organizers prior to their attack. The only reason one side won is because the other side lost

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      224 days ago

      They’ve publicly held this position for nearly 20 years now. When they publicly adopted it and got elected as the new Palestinian Authority because of it, Israel immediately declared war and prevented them taking power.

    • @dariusj18@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -224 days ago

      Well, they did fuck around and find out. Now they are facing an existential threat of their own and suddenly reasonable?