Cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/10013170

The war in Ukraine is “existential for our Europe and for France”, Mr Macron said in the interview on France 2 and TF1.

“Do you think that the Poles, the Lithuanians, the Estonians, the Romanians and the Bulgarians could remain at peace for a second [in the event of a Russian victory in Ukraine]?” he asked. “If Russia wins this war, Europe’s credibility would be reduced to zero.”

  • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -321 year ago

    Honestly it feels like the only reasonable outcome is a division like Korea, and focus on modernising and liberalising West Ukraine.

    • @Aermis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      With Ukrainian family in kharkiv, Odessa, and kiev this is not a reasonable outcome in the slightest.

        • @Aermis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          They’re still being killed there. Sure not occupied yet, but you said it’s the one reasonable thing to do.

          • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -141 year ago

            And peace would put an end to that.

            I don’t get the idea of doggedly pursuing liberation of the Crimea, etc. when it isn’t realistic and people are losing their lives.

            It’s better to have an okay-ish peace now and reorganise the country than to face total collapse if shortages continue.

            Perfection is the enemy of the good.

            • @Aermis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              Dude I’m talking about ceceding kharkiv and Odessa to Russia which is what you are saying is a reasonable solution

              • @fustigation769curtain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -21 year ago

                Have you ever considered that Ukraine is just an investment for the West? They’d rather have Ukrainians dying than their own soldiers. They don’t actually think Ukraine can win, only weaken Russia.

                This is what all Western military strategists are saying.

                • @Aermis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Considering the crippling wheat and other exports Ukraine provides for the west, yeah, there’s a lot of reasons to invest into Ukrainian victory and survival. I’m not niave to believe the US cares about Ukrainian lives.

                • ArxCyberwolf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  10
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Tell ya what, rent hasn’t been cheap. How about I come to your house and set a few things on fire and camp out in your living room and refuse to leave. I won’t hurt you if you don’t enter the living room, but I’ve claimed the whole room to myself. And you have no way of knowing if I’ll decide to take the kitchen next despite saying I won’t. Would you accept this? Because this is what you’re saying Ukraine should let Russia do to them.

                  The only peace that can be achieved here is for Russia to be defeated and driven out of Ukraine entirely. Otherwise, all you are doing is enabling Russia to regroup, rearm and attack again for more territory.

                  • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -41 year ago

                    I don’t support Russia, but you need to be realistic.

                    Who is going to be driving them out of Ukraine? Biden has refused to send the US military, and Congress refuses to send weapons.

      • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -141 year ago

        That isn’t realistic, and Russia has nuclear weapons too.

        The best bet is that the regime will be toppled in Russia with time, just like the USSR was.

        It’s better to lead by example with free institutions and free markets - the people of Russia will want freedom too.

        • @Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The US has nuclear weapons. Europe has nuclear weapons.

          Bullshit about “free institutions and free market”. That was the thought after the Soviet Union collapsed. And what do we have now? The exact opposite of what Russia “was supposed to be through open markets”.

          • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            Yeah, and they would use them if they had foreign armies pushing into their territory.

            But no efforts were made to really democratise and modernise Russia - they let oligarchs rise up from criminal gangs, etc., it’d have been better to have a more controlled process like Glasnost.

            • @RidderSport@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Yeah because Russia was not capitulated. They were a disfunctional, but sovereign country. You cannot dictate anything on them. You can lead by example or make suggestions, but ultimately it’s the will of the people that matters. In that regard the situation is rather similar to Germany post WW1. A people not yet ready for democracy and no one there to force them to. In Germany’s case it took the entire to be bombed to the ground, millions dead and being occupied by 4 not so emphatic countries.