• Turun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Fuck cars, but was it really necessary to compare at such different speeds? Air resistance is a big factor and a proper electric bike can go 45kmh as well. Or the car can drive 25kmh

    • @Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      a proper electric bike can go 45kmh as well.

      There’s some debate about that. E-bicycles above class 2 (with assistance/drive at over 20mph) are not allowed on a lot of bike lanes, so they’re more like electric mopeds

      • Turun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Yes, they are handled differently in a legal sense. This comes with some small changes to usability of e.g. bike lanes, but in terms of practicality it’s basically still a bike.

        Would still be a better comparison, since this is focused on energy consumption. Or just have the car drive slower, as per my other suggestion.

    • Deme
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The fact remains that cars are faster than bikes. Driving a car usually means going faster and hence wasting more energy. Sure, plenty of people deal with distances that necessitate such speeds to be practical in daily life, but that’s a different problem to be solved.

      • Turun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I agree.

        But if it’s a different problem to be solved the comparison is useless from the get go.

        • Deme
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Plenty of people drive short distances that could already be travelled by bike or walked. That doesn’t require any new solutions. Reminding those people of how wasteful it is to commute by car is a good way to approach that problem imo.